What's new

Ricardo Rocha

clint

Banned
Jan 20, 2005
243
0
If we sign an attacking midfielder e.g. Diego :pray: in the summer, he is better than Jenas and should play in that position. Jenas would be good cover for that position or right side midfield but you are talking about him at RB? He isn't that type of player. Same as Tainio. Eventually they would get caught out.

Poulsen is a DM.

i dont know.. jenas has the pace and abilities to make a great attacking rb, and playing there regularly and in training would force him to improve on his tackling.

tainio would also do well i think as he is a great tackler, but would not count on him getting forward much..
 

haxman

Well-Known Member
Jan 14, 2007
16,938
8,182
i dont know.. jenas has the pace and abilities to make a great attacking rb, and playing there regularly and in training would force him to improve on his tackling.

tainio would also do well i think as he is a great tackler, but would not count on him getting forward much..

But why would you play either when we have better players for those positions? Just to accomodate them?
 

dickyid

Well-Known Member
Dec 18, 2004
1,449
142
What??? Jenas out to RB? He's had a great season. He's had the odd game where he's slipped into anonymity but he's massively improved since last season, and is back playing international football. Don't slip into lazy stereotyping, please.

If we need to strengthen midfield, surely we look to replace Zokora first??
 

robbiesavagehasbreasts

dinkin' flicka!
May 23, 2007
2,689
69
Poulsen for Zokora.

For me, that would be enough. We'd have Jenas and Poulsen in midfield, with Huddlestone on the bench. O'Hara and Tainio could also step in.

That said, I wouldn't say no to the likes of Lucho Gonzales and/or Tiago.
 

SpurSince57

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2006
45,213
8,229
I dunno why people are acting like I'm the first ever person to be putting a play on players names to make them insults, it happens every day!

The idea of the thread was really to think about how in the world fill in,out of position CB's like Zokora and Hudd can be used more effectively than an experienced player like Rocha. Doesn't really work out does it? It's always going to be Rocha regardless of how much you dislike him. Because he is an actual defender. How can Ramos rate him less than the fill ins? Obviously there is some circumstance we are unaware of, there usually is, but I have been a little confused over this.

Oh, that makes it OK, then. :stupid:

It would seem so.
 

Duzza

Member
Sep 22, 2005
245
0
does anyone know if ricardo rocha will be in the reserves squad for Reading tomorrow?
 

muffwah

Active Member
Feb 8, 2007
585
215
I think that people would probably agree the centre back order is:

1/2 King/Woodgate
3 Dawson
4 Kaboul
5 Rocha
6 Zokora

Rocha simply is not going to get games. He was bought as a stopgap and that was it. What he lacks in height and pace, he makes up with his attitude and determination, but unfortunately that only takes him a certain way to becoming a decent centre back. Unfortunately he will be on his way in the summer.

NO, it is:

1/2 King/Woodgate
3 Dawson
4 Kaboul
5 Zokora
6 Huddlestone
7 Rocha
 
Top