- Nov 10, 2018
- 851
- 4,405
Think we may be being a bit harsh, we were overrun in midfield which would have made it difficult whichever two we had..
Great strike too.
Great strike too.
Think he also played the through ball which Harry really should have put away given his usual standards.Saw him getting dogs abuse in the match thread, but it was the system that was at fault, not the players. We were outnumbered. He was working his arse off as usual though getting in several key blocks.
He has a habit of scoring in big games for us too.
Think it was telling that Conte took off Bentancur for Bissouma and kept on Hojbjerg. I think he did the same in the last pre-season game too - PEH was the only CM to get the full 90.I agree but we have struggled in midfield for so long and he's just a bit light on quality in these big games. Plenty of game time for him against lesser teams but I'd have Bissouma starting more often
Just watching the highlights again. Fucking love this guy.
Also Son & Kulusevski didn't drop in quick enough at times (think you & I covered this in the match thread). When they're at their best, they make it a 5-4-1 as soon as we lose possession and we become very difficult to break down. That just didn't happen yesterday meaning Chelsea could find pockets of space all over the place, coupled with some very clever movement.I don't think a lot of people have any understanding of the enormity of the task him and Bentacur were given yesterday. I wonder if Conte might have started with 3 in CM had Bissouma or Skipp been ready for action. As it was, Hojbjerg and Bentancur put in monumental shifts, especially in that heat and being outnumbered. What made it even harder for them was the total lack of a front line press from us before Richarlison came on and started putting himself about.
Exactly. We were overrun in midfield yet again and could have easily gone two goals down before Conte changed it around. I am a great fan of Conte, but his starting formation with two in midfield was a major error, especially considering how we fared in the previous couple of games against Chelsea.Outnumbered. Don't blame the individual player for the manager's tactics and formation.
Because they had a third midfielder and because it was Jorginho, whose expert skill is sweeping up in a deep position and starting attacks, Chelsea were able to close-mark Bentancur and Højbjerg with two of the best ball-winners in the league and press and tackle them instantly, every time they got the ball, knowing that Jorginho was there if they didn't succeed. They started their press from 2m closer than we did, because they had cover.
When Richarlison came on, the change in momentum wasn't because of anything in particular he did - it was because, with four attacking players on the pitch, Kane (occasionally Kulusevski) could drop back into midfield and make the extra man, which enabled us to win and then hang onto the ball, for the first time in the match.
It worked and produced pressure for the first time, which led to Højbjerg's goal, but it required a change to 4 at the back, which was exposed badly for James' goal. Normally, our third central defender would have been in the empty space on our left that James exploited.
EDIT: incidentally, what I described in the first two paragraphs was exactly what happened in all four losses to them last season. We had no control of midfield because we were playing with two against a highly skilled and combative three.
Agree, If we can bring in an upgrade then I’m happy for him to go, but wouldn’t be unhappy if he stayedid sell (providing someone (better) coming in)