- Mar 2, 2005
- 4,304
- 7,594
Sherwood was hardly known for his tactical nous. He just wanted them to run around and have fun. That's all he was a motivatorWat?
Sherwood was hardly known for his tactical nous. He just wanted them to run around and have fun. That's all he was a motivatorWat?
Yes, agree 100%Can’t tell if you’re agreeing with me, disagreeing with me, or missed my point altogether….
Maybe it was a bit subtle -
My point is that if Levy & co aren’t going to provide the new manager with players to suit a fixed system, then they absolutely must look for a manager capable of working with what they’re given - the irony here (and my point) being that Levy & co have their own system, but have been guilty of rigid inflexibility which has had a detrimental effect on the progress of the team.
They seem to want the manager to demonstrate a willingness to change their own approach for the good of the team, when they are reluctant to change theirs for that same reason.
They can’t have it both ways - If they want a manager who will ‘work with what they have’ then they should rule out so-called ‘serial winners’ who assemble a team, and focus their efforts on recruiting someone who is a better cultural fit, willing to develop one.
In his defence he has managed professionally for decades. Gerrard tried to manage for a hot minute.No thanks - see Gerrard and Villa.
Redknapp yes 100% but dim tim .....?Wat?
Yes, of course. That's just the numbers but deeper down he has had multiple issues within clubs he has been at also. I don't believe for one minute he will be the guy we get anyway if I am honest.You've put forward a balanced set of reasons why you think `Enrique isn't your choice, just out of interest, who are you leaning more towards?
If we are in CL again next season, I don't think we will take a step back. We will have to push forward with players that are capable of playing at that level.I think whoever the club hire next, the club should take a step back and do what has worked best for them in the past.
Buy young exciting players, with potential, and a manager/coach who is happy to work with them.
It will likely cost us Harry Kane as it’ll be a more long term project. But instant success is too expensive for us.
.. players toe the Kompany line ..I've not watched any Burnley games. How does Company''s team play?
The PL has changed so much in the last few years that winning it with defensive football is gonna be harder and harder. VAR means you can’t spoil games as effectively, and the financial power of the league in Europe means there are better players spread all the way down it. You’re best bet at accruing points is to control games and keep the ball and the opposition as far away from yours as possible.Of course it's possible to win leagues with "defensive" set up even in modern Premier League.
I'm not so sure about winning leagues with such an error prone roster like Lloris, Dier, Sanchez and so on.
Calling Sherwood a motivator is something I thought I’d never see!We have gone with European and league winners in Jose, Ramos, AVB, Conte
Had motivators such as Redknapp and Sherwood
It doesn't matter what we do we always fail.
I'd like to see Kompany at Spurs. He was a brilliant captain and thinker of the game. He is well respected amongst footballers too.
Wasn’t he going hard for Poch when we ended up with Nuno?The more I think about it, the less I think it will be Poch.
If levy reappoints Poch he’s basically admitting the last 3 or 4 years have been an utter failure that’s all his fault. He’s not going to do that.
Wasn’t he going hard for Poch when we ended up with Nuno?
It's probably unrelated, but Gallardo is in London, or was in London last friday.
This girl took a pic with him at Heathrow
It's probably unrelated, but Gallardo is in London, or was in London last friday.
This girl took a pic with him at Heathrow
That frickin’ saluteCalling Sherwood a motivator is something I thought I’d never see!