- Jun 1, 2011
- 7,182
- 16,793
Meatloaf is a Yid?Personally I would take all 3.
2 out of 3 ain't bad
Quality
Meatloaf is a Yid?Personally I would take all 3.
2 out of 3 ain't bad
So while watching Eriksen play incredibly well YET AGAIN yesterday, it occurred to me that actually, he was BACK-UP to Willian (FACT).
So I thought that I'd compare the two this season for their respective clubs (I could only find stats for Europe and PL)
Eriksen: 9 Goals, 8 Assists
Willian: 3 goals, 3 Assists
So, Willian, who is in a better team that scores tons of more goals than us and is surrounded by better players has managed 6 less goals and 5 less assists.
Let's remind ourselves again. We could have signed Willian for £30 million but because he, Mourinho, Abramovich and Chelsea are massive ****s, we ended up with Eriksen for £11.5million.
WOW! Thank FUCK for that. We've signed a better player for much less money and with the potential to be lightyears ahead than Willian when he turns 25 (Willian's age)
So, thank you Chelsea, for taking Willian instead of us. We will be truly grateful when he turns into a world-class player for us in the next few years (and sell him to Madrid for £100million and buy 13 new players in Sherwood's second reign)
Can anyone truly say that they are still angry that Chelsea bought Willian and we "only" got Eriksen?
BULLET. DODGED.
this thread has the same potenital for embartoSo while watching Eriksen play incredibly well YET AGAIN yesterday, it occurred to me that actually, he was BACK-UP to Willian (FACT).
So I thought that I'd compare the two this season for their respective clubs (I could only find stats for Europe and PL)
Eriksen: 9 Goals, 8 Assists
Willian: 3 goals, 3 Assists
So, Willian, who is in a better team that scores tons of more goals than us and is surrounded by better players has managed 6 less goals and 5 less assists.
Let's remind ourselves again. We could have signed Willian for £30 million but because he, Mourinho, Abramovich and Chelsea are massive ****s, we ended up with Eriksen for £11.5million.
WOW! Thank FUCK for that. We've signed a better player for much less money and with the potential to be lightyears ahead than Willian when he turns 25 (Willian's age)
So, thank you Chelsea, for taking Willian instead of us. We will be truly grateful when he turns into a world-class player for us in the next few years (and sell him to Madrid for £100million and buy 13 new players in Sherwood's second reign)
Can anyone truly say that they are still angry that Chelsea bought Willian and we "only" got Eriksen?
BULLET. DODGED.
i started typing the exact same thing last night but stopped as i didnt want to wind Omar up again!This thread is on the level of sadness as the "lets laugh at liverpool/chelsea" threads.
Well that's clearly bollocks....they can only communicate through a series of grunts....with the occasional hiss thrown in when they see a Spurs fan.A couple of Chelsea fans have wrote that Willian has been their second best player this season behind Eden.
Ivanovic, The Spanish LB/RB, Oscar...?A couple of Chelsea fans have wrote that Willian has been their second best player this season behind Eden.
Whatever the story is, I still don't understand how we got Eriksen at such a low price, considering that he was hardly and unknown quantity, but rather was quite highly touted as one of the next big things. So why his price was so low is a bit mysterious to me.
William or not, Levy would always have snapped him up at that price, regardless of whether he was needed or not...any one can see that his value is likely to go up.
But like everyone at the moment I've extremely glad we've got him (for a few years...). Hopefully the team will be build around him.
Would be happy to have William too, though.
I'd swap him for Lamela in a second
what are you smoking man?
I think you got him mixed up with Lennon.Willian is crap man, His best attribute is "tracking back and working hard".