What's new

New Stadium Details And Discussions

spids

Well-Known Member
Jul 19, 2015
6,647
27,841
The main driver for the new stadium is increased revenue. Making the West Stand bigger by 10k would have been incredibly short sighted. With a purpose built new stadium that can host events 365 days of the year and also potential a NFL franchise we can easily become the cub with the biggest stadium related revenue in the country, if not the world. Imagine the naming rights if we hosted a CL regular football club AND a NFL franchise?
 

SandroClegane

Well-Known Member
Jun 27, 2012
3,717
13,842
Is there a plan to expand if need be?
It probably wouldn't be good for the club to expand past 60k even if the demand is there. It's better to have a heavy secondary demand for tickets than building too big and then losing that demand.

Even if we're at a point where a ST waiting list is over 20k, it's still not a great idea to expand.
 

Lilbaz

Just call me Baz
Apr 1, 2005
41,363
74,893
It probably wouldn't be good for the club to expand past 60k even if the demand is there. It's better to have a heavy secondary demand for tickets than building too big and then losing that demand.

Even if we're at a point where a ST waiting list is over 20k, it's still not a great idea to expand.

It would be good for those 20k on the waiting list. Who's to say that in 10/15 years we might not have a heavy secondary demand for tickets? Crossrail 2 will be open by then with a station at northumberland park opening us up to easy travel across london. Hopefully we will also be more successful by then. Also we can increase demand by reducing ticket prices which would be a good thing.

Never say never.
 

Saoirse

Well-Known Member
Aug 20, 2013
6,165
15,644
Most likely 'expansion' would be if safe standing was legalised and we were eventually given permission to increase the capacity of said standing section.
 

Nerine

Juicy corned beef
Jan 27, 2011
4,764
17,263
Was gonna say, surely there will be a way to expand a build like this? I would have thought that would be one of the design directives: "what if we need to make it bigger in the future.."
 

hillbilly

Active Member
Dec 18, 2013
119
187
Presently, haringey council would not allow expansion due to concerns about too many people coming in and going out of the area on match days and the current transport infrastructure being inadequate. This could change in the future but it would take a fair bit of work and money. I'm not sure how many people Crossrail 2 will be designed to move in and out but i can't imagine it would be sufficient.
 

Lilbaz

Just call me Baz
Apr 1, 2005
41,363
74,893
Presently, haringey council would not allow expansion due to concerns about too many people coming in and going out of the area on match days and the current transport infrastructure being inadequate. This could change in the future but it would take a fair bit of work and money. I'm not sure how many people Crossrail 2 will be designed to move in and out but i can't imagine it would be sufficient.

If it is the same as cross rail it would be able to move 48k people an hour (24k in each direction). Plus the stations are designed for extra carriages if needed.
 

Saoirse

Well-Known Member
Aug 20, 2013
6,165
15,644
Presently, haringey council would not allow expansion due to concerns about too many people coming in and going out of the area on match days and the current transport infrastructure being inadequate. This could change in the future but it would take a fair bit of work and money. I'm not sure how many people Crossrail 2 will be designed to move in and out but i can't imagine it would be sufficient.
Crossrail 2 would make a big difference. First problem though is that it's a long way off. Second is that it might not happen at all - it was in the Tory Manifesto for 2015 but is suspiciously absent this time (despite other ongoing projects like HS2 being confirmed in it), prompting speculation they might be planning to bin it if they win again.
 

Lilbaz

Just call me Baz
Apr 1, 2005
41,363
74,893
Crossrail 2 would make a big difference. First problem though is that it's a long way off. Second is that it might not happen at all - it was in the Tory Manifesto for 2015 but is suspiciously absent this time (despite other ongoing projects like HS2 being confirmed in it), prompting speculation they might be planning to bin it if they win again.

Doubt it. It's needed and the tories will be looking at infrastructure projects post brexit.
 

Saoirse

Well-Known Member
Aug 20, 2013
6,165
15,644
Doubt it. It's needed and the tories will be looking at infrastructure projects post brexit.
Totally agree and hope you're right, but we'll have to see. Politically it would be understandable for them to write off London (which now seems to be broadly voting Labour no matter what) and look towards infrastructure in the midlands and north where they're growing instead.
 

Lilbaz

Just call me Baz
Apr 1, 2005
41,363
74,893
Totally agree and hope you're right, but we'll have to see. Politically it would be understandable for them to write off London (which now seems to be broadly voting Labour no matter what) and look towards infrastructure in the midlands and north where they're growing instead.

It's not just about votes though. Infrastructure in london gives far greater economic rewards than investment elsewhere. A lot of the money will come from buisiness anyway and also if they did it right they could use it too build plenty of new housing and offices. If they followed hong kongs mode they could lease it to subsidise travel.
 

Saoirse

Well-Known Member
Aug 20, 2013
6,165
15,644
It's not just about votes though. Infrastructure in london gives far greater economic rewards than investment elsewhere. A lot of the money will come from buisiness anyway and also if they did it right they could use it too build plenty of new housing and offices. If they followed hong kongs mode they could lease it to subsidise travel.

True, hence why I hope they go ahead with it, but those economic rewards come long after the current crop are out of government. You'll have to excuse my cynicism but I don't exactly trust them to put the long-term national interest ahead of chasing votes at the next election.
 

Always Offside

Ardent Aussie
Oct 31, 2013
781
1,282
Most likely 'expansion' would be if safe standing was legalised and we were eventually given permission to increase the capacity of said standing section.

If the old WHL used to hold over 100k standing back in the good old days, how many could fit standing in the new model, 150k+ ?
 

spids

Well-Known Member
Jul 19, 2015
6,647
27,841
Safe standing basically means taking out the seats and allowing the people who would have been sat in those seats to stand. I would not expect much increase in capacity, just an increase in atmosphere.
 

nicdic

Official SC Padre
Admin
May 8, 2005
41,857
25,920
If safe standing is introduced, the South Stand is ready and raring to go, and the capacity would increase by about 7,000 / 8,000 if I remember right. The other stands aren't being built with safe standing as a consideration.
 

hillbilly

Active Member
Dec 18, 2013
119
187
If it is the same as cross rail it would be able to move 48k people an hour (24k in each direction). Plus the stations are designed for extra carriages if needed.

But its not just the trains to get people in and out of the area, its all the extra people walking on the pavements and, unavoidably, in the roads, going WHL, Seven Sisters, Northumberland Park etc. Just think about the walk from Wembley to the tube station; there is a dedicated and very wide walkway to the tube station and it is still jam packed.
 

Hoopspur

You have insufficient privileges to reply here!
Jun 28, 2012
6,333
9,703
Safe standing provides circa 3 standing spaces for every 2 seats (based on the German rail system). I've read about it maybe a year ago online somewhere.
 
Top