I'd have him over Demichelis and Kolo.Now he wouldn't. Not talking about the last 5 years. Tell me who he would replace in the teams now above us then?
I'd have him over Demichelis and Kolo.Now he wouldn't. Not talking about the last 5 years. Tell me who he would replace in the teams now above us then?
Both aren't first choice for there clubsI'd have him over Demichelis and Kolo.
If we want to get into the top4 now, and push further, we need better than Dawson. That's all I'm saying. If he starts every game next season, we won't get thereBut you just moved the goalposts.
You started by saying he wouldn't make a top 6 side......well, we are 5th.
Then you ask who above us would he get into?.....that's top 4 currently, with nothing settled yet.
You can't have it both ways.
And are you telling me he couldn't compete with 1 or 2 of Arsenal or Liverpools CBs?
Erm the point was replying to the thread itself that Dawson was having a go at the other players, however he almost cost us two goals in the first 15mins so I don't think him having a go would work. So an almost goal is a thing that wasn't a goal but it was almost a goal ie the Hazard chances.... sorry if that confuses you
I wasn't picking on Dawson rather stating he didn't have a good game either so him having a go at anyone would seem hypocritical IMO.
I think if you read what I wrote I said no one had a bad game, so unless "no one" doesn't include them players I think you should perhaps not make a pretty stupid comment
If we want to get into the top4 now, and push further, we need better than Dawson. That's all I'm saying. If he starts every game next season, we won't get there
Sorry fella, all respect to your opinions, but you've changed your stance again.
You are now talking about breaking top 4, when the original argument was about Daws not making a top 6 side.
I don't disagree that we need to improve some players to ensure a genuine title challenge (which is what it would become if able to break the top 4) but the rest of the team, not one individual, are currently not good enough to ensure this happens, and until they improve, then Daws is no better or no worse than them.[/quote
If I had said daws not good enough for top 4 side. You would have come back at me saying we aren't a top 4 side. Most important position is center back, and a center back pairing. Put. Top player next to vert for a run of games, and it will be the biggest improvement we can make
I heard Robinson punched Mido and Keano stepped in and slapped both of them.
I would have been more concerned if this didn't happen. They're top professionals and shouldn't accept low standards.
Yeah. That will win us a top 4 spot. A crap defender with passion. Well done sir.
If Dawson isn't allowed to have a pop at people not treating games seriously enough because he isn't as talented as them, then it really is a wonder that the likes of Terry, Puyol even Materazzi have had the careers they did
What the hell is an "almost goal"?
How on earth do you pick Dawson out for that?
Why are you not writing.....Verts, Sandro, Walker were responsible for ACTUAL goals.
Total inconsistency.
It's generally agreed by Jose Mournho that City have a better squad. The whole thing of Man City having the better squad was dreamt up by Jose to put pressure on them. The truth is that Pochettino would love to have Hazard, Oscar, Willian, Matic, Cech, Ivanovic in his team.
The whole 'Man City are peerless' thing is just a mind game from Mourinho. It lessens the pressure on his players, turns it up on the City players, and results in whatever happening at the end of the season Jose comes out smelling like roses. There is very little difference between the two sides.
just wandering if anybody else had heard anything??
Erm the point was replying to the thread itself that Dawson was having a go at the other players, however he almost cost us two goals in the first 15mins so I don't think him having a go would work. So an almost goal is a thing that wasn't a goal but it was almost a goal ie the Hazard chances.... sorry if that confuses you
I wasn't picking on Dawson rather stating he didn't have a good game either so him having a go at anyone would seem hypocritical IMO.
I think if you read what I wrote I said no one had a bad game, so unless "no one" doesn't include them players I think you should perhaps not make a pretty stupid comment