- Jan 28, 2011
- 5,715
- 79,701
Unsurprisingly, not much in the way of eloquence and beautifully crafted black humour on the 'Up the Clarets' forum, but, 70 minutes in, someone did post this...
There some top notch idiocy in there. The midfield isn’t low key and is easily top 4 quality, with Bentancur still to come. The last comment just boggles my mind, people really do think we are better because Kane isn’t there rather than in spite of him not being there. It’s astounding. The guy who thinks we lucked into Ange on the other hand might have a point….Arsenal Mania:
Postecogliou might be the signing of the season tbh. Spurs look annoyingly good.
I think the same. They look so ***ing fresh attacking-wise. He did a very good job.
Hasn't even got "his " players too for the most part.
Spurs might low key have a top four central midfield. Early days obviously but the balance looks great and Maddison looks far better than I expected him to be.
What's annoying is that Ange wasn't even top choice or close apparently. They've almost lucked their way into getting him.
Spurs have been looking much better without trying to play through Kane all the time.
Arsenal Mania:
Postecogliou might be the signing of the season tbh. Spurs look annoyingly good.
I think the same. They look so ***ing fresh attacking-wise. He did a very good job.
Hasn't even got "his " players too for the most part.
Spurs might low key have a top four central midfield. Early days obviously but the balance looks great and Maddison looks far better than I expected him to be.
What's annoying is that Ange wasn't even top choice or close apparently. They've almost lucked their way into getting him.
Spurs have been looking much better without trying to play through Kane all the time.
Talk about going early!Westham and Sp**s are competing for title imo."
Talk about going early!
Alright, calm down mate."Westham and Sp**s are competing for title imo."
Liverpool fans will always be weird.RAWK
- Maddison is some player. Coutinho-esque actually. Can't believe I convinced myself that Grealish was the better player a few years ago.
- They've had a fairly easy start so I wouldn't get too excited about him just yet, he's talented but has never shown much consistency
- He will disappear sooner than you expect ...
- Ange is a top coach tbf
- Yeah, much more suitable than the managers they hired in that weird period where they thought all they needed was "a winner" who could change the loser Spurs image. Poch to Mourinho remains the weirdest managerial transitions possibly ever.
The trouble he has is defining what success is for Spurs. Winning a trophy is the obvious answer. Consistently qualifying for the Champions League? One of the issues with City's ill-gotten dominance is teams like Spurs have basically no hope of transcending themselves.- And very likable from what I've seen of him so far.
- Likable fellas win fuck all, well apart from Bill, Bob, Joe, Kenny, Ged, Rafa & Jurgen
- Tottenham really need to create an identity for themselves. Now that they have a new stadium, a solid new manager, a solid team, and have finally released the ballast of the loser Kane, they should start building. Oh, and they should definitely stop making stupid expensive signings like Richarlison. Go back to the basics, find talented young players before their price has exploded, and develop them
They are the worst.Liverpool fans will always be weird.
They're just jealous because he was world class and they didn't feel we deserved him.It’s surprising just how many fans from different clubs mention that we must be better off without the serial loser Kane.
Obviously our focus was always the goals and what he adds. Other fans see a player not turning up at the big moments. Talk about a game of different opinions.
Looks like other fans are just starting to worry that the we aren’t just being made to look good by other teams.
They're just jealous because he was world class and they didn't feel we deserved him.