- Apr 16, 2005
- 16,047
- 18,013
Will the departure of Andros Townsend play a part in Tottenham's January transfer market trading?
Read the full article at Huffington Post
Read the full article at Huffington Post
This guy had about 10 gameswhere he was magical last season, ran really fast and shot a lot, but didn't really score, assist, make key passess or anything of actual use. He made the England squad, which isn't much to get excited about these days, played for England and scored, against the mighty Montenegro, came back and got injured. That was the beginning and end of Townsend and was a complete waste for the last 2 games - and yes, he did score from the penalty spot against Chelsea but nothing else - agree, time to move on!
Wouldn't lose any sleep if he was sold,pretty average player imo.
He seems to be all huff & puff with all real end product to his game.I would play Holtby in his position instead,oh hang on
Wouldn't lose any sleep if he was sold,pretty average player imo.
He seems to be all huff & puff with all real end product to his game.I would play Holtby in his position instead,oh hang on
I'd rather Pritchard.
Not a winger either.
No he's not a winger but he has played on the left for us a few timesThankfully you're not the manager considering Holtby is a CM or CDM which ever he prefers. certainly isnt a winger. But i agree with your assesment of Townsend
Not sure if you've noticed, our system isn't setup for wingers...
So thats why Eriksen's not as effective when hes played out there, but we should get rid of the wide men and play good middlemen out there instead?
No he's not a winger but he has played on the left for us a few times
Firstly Pritchard is absolutely nothing alike Eriksen, just because he's an AMF by trade does not mean he cannot do a job as a wide forward. He's more dynamic and presses better than Eriksen and would be a natural fit as a wide forward in this team, much more natural then Townsend.
What you need to ask yourself is what to you think the manager is trying to achieve with this formation and group of players, what type of players the manager is looking for to fit his system as opposed to just looking at positions of players and assuming that players cannot play there.
So I prefer to ask you, what would you suggest he would be trying to achieve with no natural width?