What's new

The Cricket Thread

Arnoldtoo

The thinking ape's ape
May 18, 2006
35,423
55,218
A pity they didn't review that last one from Curran, cos 2 down would have been great, but too big a risk.

On the whole a good day for England, and I think a bit harsh to criticise Sibley for slow play after lunch, so I'll let him off! :D
 

JimmyG2

SC Supporter
Dec 7, 2006
15,014
20,779
Sir Beefy given a Peerage to go with his knighthood.
Not sure what that's all about.

Raining in Manchester.
Does the Pope defecate in the woods?
 

southlondonyiddo

My eyes have seen some of the glory..
Nov 8, 2004
12,656
15,221
Why do we persist with Butler? he’s an average wicket keeper and a fucking awful test batsman!

No doubt he’ll get another game in a few days time

Poor old Foakes. Brilliant keeper and looks like he’s got the technique and temperament to do well with the bat. Already started well. Very unlucky to have only played 5 tests so far...
 

dondo

Well-Known Member
Jan 4, 2006
8,603
14,091
Building up to a great finish this one. Quick runs for a 250+ lead into the last day ?.
F****** hit it boys
 

Arnoldtoo

The thinking ape's ape
May 18, 2006
35,423
55,218
We've got to set them a target they think they might reach. Too high and why would they bother?

Could be a great finish.
 

southlondonyiddo

My eyes have seen some of the glory..
Nov 8, 2004
12,656
15,221
We've got to set them a target they think they might reach. Too high and why would they bother?

Could be a great finish.

90 overs tomorrow?

They are 1-0 up. They don’t need to win the game. It’s all about us trying to leave ourselves enough overs to bowl them out

At the very very best (with Stokes going nuts) I reckon we get 84 overs at them without it being a silly declaration and that is very optimistic

270 to win in 84 overs

A target of 300 in 70/75 overs is more realistic
 

Arnoldtoo

The thinking ape's ape
May 18, 2006
35,423
55,218
90 overs tomorrow?

They are 1-0 up. They don’t need to win the game. It’s all about us trying to leave ourselves enough overs to bowl them out

At the very very best (with Stokes going nuts) I reckon we get 84 overs at them without it being a silly declaration and that is very optimistic

270 to win in 84 overs

A target of 300 in 70/75 overs is more realistic

Is it only 90? Or will they still add a few overs on to make up for yesterday? I don't know the rules on that!
 

southlondonyiddo

My eyes have seen some of the glory..
Nov 8, 2004
12,656
15,221
Is it only 90? Or will they still add a few overs on to make up for yesterday? I don't know the rules on that!

Just heard it’s 98 overs. Lose 2 for change of innings...

So 96 overs. Bat for 9 - 275 lead with 87 left. 7 overs with a 2nd new ball...
 

southlondonyiddo

My eyes have seen some of the glory..
Nov 8, 2004
12,656
15,221
275 at just over 3 an over? Root won't risk that. Will he? Hanse Cronje would, but Root ... ?

In an ideal world he’d love a chance to bowl them out with 2 new balls. In reality that might not be possible without, as you say, a 'very generous' declaration!!!

They’ll have to play it by ear and see where we are. If Stokes gets into beast mode and the Windies radar is a little off, who knows...

9 overs @10 - 90 = 310 target of 87 overs = 3.5 per over!?!?

Chasing 310 on the final day, even with Dom Bess bowling, good luck to them...
 

Arnoldtoo

The thinking ape's ape
May 18, 2006
35,423
55,218
In an ideal world he’d love a chance to bowl them out with 2 new balls. In reality that might not be possible without, as you say, a 'very generous' declaration!!!

They’ll have to play it by ear and see where we are. If Stokes gets into beast mode and the Windies radar is a little off, who knows...

9 overs @10 - 90 = 310 target of 87 overs = 3.5 per over!?!?

Chasing 310 on the final day, even with Dom Bess bowling, good luck to them...

I hope it's going to be adventure over pragmatism. We shall see!
 
D

Deleted member 27995

Gave away far too many runs in the first session yesterday 20/20 and all that but we were shite for the most part.
 
Top