I'm glad that's a red. I hate those types of tackles. No control, feet off the ground, no intention whatsoever of winning the ball.
That was far worse, he absolutely went through Lucas from memory.Luke Shaw was only given a yellow for something very similar against us last year
I'm glad that's a red. I hate those types of tackles. No control, feet off the ground, no intention whatsoever of winning the ball.
The intent was the same tonight, you're getting taken out no matter whatThat was far worse, he absolutely went through Lucas from memory.
But all those other examples are no chance of wining the ball either. Why not red them too then?100% this. These "tackles" can be easily stripped out off the game if enough of them are a red card in a short space of time.
I get someone pulling a shirt back, clipping an ankle, or barging in but those cynical of the feet challenges which have no chance off winning the ball should be harshly challenged.
You mean like the opponents always go after Kane's ankle because they know it's weak...100% this. These "tackles" can be easily stripped out off the game if enough of them are a red card in a short space of time.
I get someone pulling a shirt back, clipping an ankle, or barging in but those cynical of the feet challenges which have no chance off winning the ball should be harshly challenged.
Because they have less chance of breaking a leg or seriously injuring a player.But all those other examples are no chance of wining the ball either. Why not red them too then?
I'm not interested in what is happening in a split minute. He had no control, studs showing off the ground and was pure chance he didn't injure the opponent. If that was Allan on Kane there's not a single person on this forum who says that's not a red.when you say No Control, what are you thinking is going to happen in that split second.? It’s a def yellow, it’s cynical
when you say No Control, what are you thinking is going to happen in that split second.? It’s a def yellow, it’s cynical