- Jan 16, 2019
- 9,933
- 52,172
NoCan yellow cards be rescinded?
NoCan yellow cards be rescinded?
Can yellow cards be rescinded?
Can yellow cards be rescinded?
I see, as I saw the yellow I assumed it was a second yellow.No, but Son didn't get a yellow. Atkinson took the yellow out to book him, then saw Gomes' leg, put the yellow away and pulled the red out instead.
It was a straight red card and can therefore be appealed and rescinded.
You can protest a red, and it can be overturned....can't remember a successful appeal for anything other than a case of mistaken identity against AOC years ago
Certainly don't remember a yellow being over turned
I see, as I saw the yellow I assumed it was a second yellow.
Based on this do you think there’s any chance it will be overturned?You can protest a red, and it can be overturned....can't remember a successful appeal for anything other than a case of mistaken identity against AOC years ago
Certainly don't remember a yellow being over turned
It should be but I don’t see it, if they’ve come out with an explanation on why he was sent off I can’t see them changing it, they’d make themselves look stupidBased on this do you think there’s any chance it will be overturned?
Racially abused as he left the pitch by some neanderthal according to the sun
I'm not going to watch it again but several people seem to think the damage was done when he got his studs stuck in the turf and went over on his ankle between Son and Aurier. As for the booing, I think everybody was booing everything by the end of the match.Technically I can’t see how the card can’t be rescinded, though I doubt it will be. It was all set to be a yellow, meaning the ref judged the tackle as a yellow card offence. He changed it when he saw the injury but actually if it’s proven that it was the aftermath with Aurier that caused the injury, Son’s tackle should’ve remained a yellow.
I haven’t seen the full replay yet but I’ve seen the pictures, it looks bad from Aurier but a pic can make things look much worse than it is, so hopefully Aurier’s tackle was accidental because of the way Gomez landed after Son’s tackle. It sounded like the Everton fans booed the ref for sending off Son instead of Aurier but again that’s just guesswork.
Losing Son for 3 games for that is a bit of a shambles even though I understand why the ref has done it. He shouldn’t have though. Nicest guy in football has 2 undeserved (IMO) red cards in a few months! Bottom line in this instance is that if Aurier wasn’t there, Gomez wouldn’t have broken his foot.
I thought the same thing, players are never going to tackle again. Like Poch said, Atkinson has judged the situation on the result rather than the foul itself, which is no way to be going about things. Actually, it's worse than that, he's taken a massive shot in the dark because he'd have brandished the red straight away if he thought it was a red card challenge.This nonsense they've subsequently come out with justifying the sending of is laughable.
That basically means even the most innocuous challenge could be a red card if it leads to an awkward fall.
Regardless of how it technically happened, it no doubt started off due to a reckless challenge from Son.I'm not going to watch it again but several people seem to think the damage was done when he got his studs stuck in the turf and went over on his ankle between Son and Aurier.
That doesn't (and shouldn't) matter. Yes he was injured because of the consequences of Son's challenge but that challenge in and of itself wasn't worth more than a yellow card. Rondon didn't get sent off for breaking McCarthy's leg in two a couple of seasons ago.Regardless of how it technically happened, it no doubt started off due to a reckless challenge from Son.
Regardless of how it technically happened, it no doubt started off due to a reckless challenge from Son.
Thats fine, but I'm not going to get pissed at a referee after Son's reckless challenge leads to potentially ending a guys career.That doesn't (and shouldn't) matter. Yes he was injured because of the consequences of Son's challenge but that challenge in and of itself wasn't worth more than a yellow card. Rondon didn't get sent off for breaking McCarthy's leg in two a couple of seasons ago.
This is the main factor with the red card. Its ridiculous reasoning.This nonsense they've subsequently come out with justifying the sending of is laughable.
That basically means even the most innocuous challenge could be a red card if it leads to an awkward fall.
Thats fine, but I'm not going to get pissed at a referee after Son's reckless challenge leads to potentially ending a guys career.