- Apr 4, 2006
- 5,428
- 8,184
Also, has he apologised yet?
Don't keep up with players social medias myself.
Don't keep up with players social medias myself.
Unless you think his name being a Tagalog word for vagina is cute...There was nothing cute or sneaky about Pepe.
He definitely was a ****.Unless you think his name being a Tagalog word for vagina is cute...
They got a lot of red cards so not sure how true that isPepe and Ramos got away with far more than they should have because they played for Madrid.
Our players will not be afforded that same luxury.
They got a lot of red cards so not sure how true that is
The mods have previously said it's because of advertisers.Fucking hell, you can't say c u next Tuesday on a football forum for a London based team with an Australian manager?
That's just weird
The mods have previously said it's because of advertisers.
Unless we appeal and get it reduced. Not seen anything though and not sure it will be worth itIs he definitely banned for three games?
Also - Madrid in the Ramos days had talent that meant they could still walk over teams with 10 in a top heavy La Liga. We don't have that luxury in the EPL.I think we're agreeing really.
What I'm saying is that Madrid players get away with things a spurs player could never dream of.
Therefore Romero needs to chill the fuck out.
He got sent off a lot that's why. That was without var and he got sent off more than Romero is so far in his career.I don't understand why so many keep mentioning Ramos, in his time there wasn't var so it's totally different case now.
There was nothing cute or sneaky about Pepe.
I think Romero most likely cost us the win and 3 points, with 10 we might have been able to get a draw, Udogie again was reckless but in comparison, that most probably extinguished any hope of even salvaging a draw and preserving our unbeaten run so that most likely cost us one point.On the whole we're better with him and his faults than without him. Talk of getting rid is crazy. He's one of the best defenders in the league. His temper is what makes him such a good defender. We will just have to live with the risk and hope he can change a little.
i actually think Udogie cost us the game more. He should have been sent off for an even worse tackle and then lunges in when there was no need to. Why isn't he getting the same treatment?
We're definitely going to be worse off without him over the next few games.
No point at all in doing that. He deserved the red and should have been carded earlier. It's the same with Udogie they both got away with one and appeared to learn nothing from it. Both stupid and both fully deserved.Unless we appeal and get it reduced. Not seen anything though and not sure it will be worth it
Whereas Curtis Jones‘ follow through was upheld and he still received a three game ban.I would appeal the red. The league has already deemed a follow through clearance as not a red. Balbuenas red was rescinded for an equally bad, or worse, looking clearance.