What's new

New Stadium Details And Discussions

Hoopspur

You have insufficient privileges to reply here!
Jun 28, 2012
6,333
9,703
So is it now - that the bowl can now be worked on at the same time as the old South Stand demolished with not such quite the matter of priority?
 
Last edited:

Buggsy61

Washed Up Member
Aug 31, 2012
5,648
9,068
I guess with the North stand out of the way they will be able to really crack on with the new East and West stands, before the new South stand goes in, and then the roof starts in Jan/Feb 18 if I remember rightly from the schedule.
Exciting times
 

DanielCHillier

Well-Known Member
Feb 26, 2014
2,036
4,029
I guess with the North stand out of the way they will be able to really crack on with the new East and West stands, before the new South stand goes in, and then the roof starts in Jan/Feb 18 if I remember rightly from the schedule.
Exciting times
Looks like another couple of weeks of piling before that can happen.
 

danielneeds

Kick-Ass
May 5, 2004
24,182
48,812
They definitely look ahead of schedule at the moment though. The talk was the start of the new season before demolition would have been completed.

I dunno what penalty clauses Daniel put in the contract but Mace are really kicking ass.
 

Roynie

Well-Known Member
Oct 2, 2007
3,116
3,882
They definitely look ahead of schedule at the moment though. The talk was the start of the new season before demolition would have been completed.

I dunno what penalty clauses Daniel put in the contract but Mace are really kicking ass.

Might be more incentive bonuses to finish early. IIRC David Matzdorf and others on here were saying quite a while ago now, that the the penalty clauses weren't that effective and usually were negotiated away after lengthy discussions (paraphrasing). Bonuses were likely to be more effective.

Of course it does depend on whatever Dear Leader has managed to get the companies to sign!
 

danielneeds

Kick-Ass
May 5, 2004
24,182
48,812
Might be more incentive bonuses to finish early. IIRC David Matzdorf and others on here were saying quite a while ago now, that the the penalty clauses weren't that effective and usually were negotiated away after lengthy discussions (paraphrasing). Bonuses were likely to be more effective.

Of course it does depend on whatever Dear Leader has managed to get the companies to sign!
This is the man who managed to get Boro to pay £7m for a 18 stone Mido so anything's possible....
 

davidmatzdorf

Front Page Gadfly
Jun 7, 2004
18,106
45,030
They aren't "penalty clauses". Penalties are illegal in building contracts. They're damages for late completion, related to the extra costs incurred by the Employer as a result of the Contractor completing the project late.

And as @Roynie says, I did write, more than once, that they are ineffective. When you can actually enforce them, as opposed to the usual end-result of reaching a commercial settlement (compromise) with the contractor, you get some money back, perhaps 2 years later, but the threat of damages doesn't get the building finished any sooner.

In a construction-management contractor such as this one, I would not be surprised to to see financial incentives for early completion, as well as damages for late completion.

I wouldn't draw any conclusions about work being ahead of schedule. They're obviously beavering away vigorously on site, but it's likely that some areas/aspects of the job are ahead of the programme, whereas others are behind the programme. It's not possible to judge progress on a contract of this size by looking at how busy the site it, or how much built structure has appeared. You'd have to sit down with the detailed, week-by-week programme and work it out. It would take hours and there are people being paid to do just that.
 

worcestersauce

"I'm no optimist I'm just a prisoner of hope
Jan 23, 2006
26,960
45,234
From a business point of view the completion of this project on time and in budget is pretty good to have on your curriculum vitae, pretty rewarding financially in the future too I'd have thought.
 

Wine Gum

Well-Known Member
May 14, 2007
593
2,118
Compression ring going up on the North Stand.

VFItIVn.jpg
 

Roynie

Well-Known Member
Oct 2, 2007
3,116
3,882
They aren't "penalty clauses". Penalties are illegal in building contracts. They're damages for late completion, related to the extra costs incurred by the Employer as a result of the Contractor completing the project late.

And as @Roynie says, I did write, more than once, that they are ineffective. When you can actually enforce them, as opposed to the usual end-result of reaching a commercial settlement (compromise) with the contractor, you get some money back, perhaps 2 years later, but the threat of damages doesn't get the building finished any sooner.

In a construction-management contractor such as this one, I would not be surprised to to see financial incentives for early completion, as well as damages for late completion.

I wouldn't draw any conclusions about work being ahead of schedule. They're obviously beavering away vigorously on site, but it's likely that some areas/aspects of the job are ahead of the programme, whereas others are behind the programme. It's not possible to judge progress on a contract of this size by looking at how busy the site it, or how much built structure has appeared. You'd have to sit down with the detailed, week-by-week programme and work it out. It would take hours and there are people being paid to do just that.

Thanks @davidmatzdorf , nice to know that I remembered the important bits and that the grey cell isn't quite dead yet! (y)
 

Krule

Carpe Diem
Jun 4, 2017
4,534
8,687
I guess with the North stand out of the way they will be able to really crack on with the new East and West stands, before the new South stand goes in, and then the roof starts in Jan/Feb 18 if I remember rightly from the schedule.
Exciting times

That's correct. I remember reading that if we don't see the roof start to go on in January then it's not on schedule.
 

Dundalk_Spur

The only Spur in the village
Jul 17, 2008
4,960
7,695
No more old WHL to look at. Cameras moved and its like, forget about that, look at the shiny new toy we are gonna have.
 

Buggsy61

Washed Up Member
Aug 31, 2012
5,648
9,068
That's a fantastic angle, can almost imagine that as being sat in the top tier.
Its brilliant - you can really start to get an appreciation of what view you are gong to get, and it does really hit home how high its going to be at the top tier.
Middle tier for me if I can get it - East Stand middle tier near to the South Stand (Park Lane) i.e back to the shelf where it all started for me 37 years ago!.
 
Top