- May 20, 2013
- 661
- 2,133
Sorry thought this was the Sporting Director thread. Not knickers in a twist over net spend one.
And we weren't 9th richest club in the world for last 20 years...We've spent 500m more than Villa. According to that we've spent 250m more than Bayern too. Just because we've sold players to supplement that doesn't mean that we haven't spent. You're being intentionally thick and you're clearly trolling at this point.
We didn't sell anyone which we needed to do. The players you mentioned are you happy with them?
We are reportedly the 9th richest Club in the world. If you feel we our revenue streams over the last 20 years spending 15m more than Aston Villa (who spent 3 years in the championship) means we have spent as we should be then good for you. But I won't be applauding the transfer committee. Get someone in and give them serious control on transfers so we can start operating like the club our owners like to pretend we are.
We've spent 500m more than Villa. According to that we've spent 250m more than Bayern too. Just because we've sold players to supplement that doesn't mean that we haven't spent. You're being intentionally thick and you're clearly trolling at this point.
We are the 10th richest club right now. We made it into 9th in 2019 and have fallen back one place. Historically over the last 14 years we've been mostly around 11th (11.2 is the average position), but have moved in between 10th and 14th over this time. Here's the full list with link below:
2021: 10th
2019: 9th
2018: 10th
2017: 10th
2016: 10th
2015: 13th
2014: 13th
2013: 11th
2012: 11th
2011: 11th
2010: 12th
2009: 11th
2008: 12th
2007: 14th
Forbes list of the most valuable football clubs - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
It does seem you're very good at cherry picking data to suit your argument. However when you look at the real data we're actually pretty closely aligned with net spend and wealth of the club. Slightly more conservative than some but less conservative than others.
Again during this period we have also invested massively in the stadium and training facilities.
Yes those people who profess to be wise will defend levy if he ran over a guinea pig in front of kids, when countless managers complain you know where a lot of the for the clubs failings lay.OK where are Aston Villa on the richest Club list over the last 20 years. Then explain why as a club when looking at Net spend we've only managed to spend 15m more than them. I'm not cherry picking anything in fact you providing that list only makes it worse and shows the lack of investment is even more inexcusable. We have had at least 4 managers moan about the lack of investment and the need to go for it in the transfer market, according to a few wise ones in here they are wrong and we have invested correct. We posted near 200m profit over 2 seasons while signing no one for 18 months. Yet we have spent in line with our capabilities. That fact alone suggests we haven't. Like I said get someone in and put them in total control of recruitment. People hated dealing with levy before this ESL debacle. He needs to step aside and let someone else try and build bridges
They all go that way at some pointSorry thought this was the Sporting Director thread. Not knickers in a twist over net spend one.
And Brexit. That's what the ENIC "debate" most resembles now.This thread has turned into the love child of covid and aids
By repeating the Aston Villa rhetoric you’re literally cherry picking. What about Liverpool - they’ve massively underinvested over the last 5 years by your standards and it’s won them the PL and CL. There’s other examples here but the point is we’re investing at a slightly conservative rate to our wealth but within reasonable levels. By citing the likes of Villa your just making an argument that ENIC should be putting their hands in their pockets and funding us so we can spend outside of our means. It’s a crap argument IMO.OK where are Aston Villa on the richest Club list over the last 20 years. Then explain why as a club when looking at Net spend we've only managed to spend 15m more than them. I'm not cherry picking anything in fact you providing that list only makes it worse and shows the lack of investment is even more inexcusable. We have had at least 4 managers moan about the lack of investment and the need to go for it in the transfer market, according to a few wise ones in here they are wrong and we have invested correct. We posted near 200m profit over 2 seasons while signing no one for 18 months. Yet we have spent in line with our capabilities. That fact alone suggests we haven't. Like I said get someone in and put them in total control of recruitment. People hated dealing with levy before this ESL debacle. He needs to step aside and let someone else try and build bridges
Haha, great analogy. Some fans will whip themselves into a frenzy over ENICxit with dreams of us spending 350m a year on transfers only for us to be bought by a greedy, corrupt owner, probably American, who is hell bent on rinsing as much money from us possible and champions things like ESL and other franchise based sports models. Suddenly 2 years after ENICxit when all the ENICxiteers are wondering why we're not signing mega players and instead struggling to attract any decent players to the club, with the memory of Kane, who has since gone on two win 2 x CL medals with Real Madrid, the one thing the fans are clinging onto.And Brexit. That's what the ENIC "debate" most resembles now.
Player identification and scouting. Arguably the Most important job in any club. We bought the best of young British talent and we went away from that.By repeating the Aston Villa rhetoric you’re literally cherry picking. What about Liverpool - they’ve massively underinvested over the last 5 years by your standards and it’s won them the PL and CL. There’s other examples here but the point is we’re investing at a slightly conservative rate to our wealth but within reasonable levels. By citing the likes of Villa your just making an argument that ENIC should be putting their hands in their pockets and funding us so we can spend outside of our means. It’s a crap argument IMO.
The ESL debacle is also a crap argument, if it had gone ahead without us as one of the 12 (maybe with Villa in there) then there would be people screaming at Levy for fucking our club up for the next 20+ years.
What we need IMO is a proper DoF that can use the funds we have to drive a proper and successful player recruitment strategy.
I blame Levy for getting us up to the 9th richest club in the world.And we weren't 9th richest club in the world for last 20 years...
HIs transfer record at Leizpig isn't that impressive...Bestätigt: RB Leipzig und Krösche gehen getrennte Wege
Markus Krösche wird RB Leipzig nach zwei Jahren verlassen. Noch ist unklar, wohin es den Sportdirektor zieht - Interesse zeigt aber wohl ein Bundesliga-Konkurrent.www.kicker.de
RB Leipzig DoF Markus Krösche is leaving the bundesliga-outfit after 2 years.
Linked to Eintracht Frankfurt, but we should be all over him as far as I'm concerned...
He put deals on the table for Grealish and Bruno. We wanted Ruben Dias, so it doesn’t seem like he can’t spot a player, but we don’t seem to uncover any cheap players that explode in the way some of the top recruiting clubs do.Here’s a question, is Hitchen’s problem that he actually isn’t that good a talent spotter?
Or is it that maybe his suggestions are just being rejected by the manager, or even that the deals are simply being cocked up Levy?
You look at some of the gems other clubs uncover, and we don’t seem to be as cute in the market anymore, spend time chasing known quantities where rivals can blow is out the water with their finances.