- Apr 17, 2004
- 2,365
- 1,481
Doesn't happen to Arteta.Ange is doing well it's going to happen isn't it.
Doesn't happen to Arteta.Ange is doing well it's going to happen isn't it.
Maybe because he's an absolute creature.Doesn't happen to Arteta.
Possibly, but then I think if he had a world class forward option on the bench he would have gone with them insteadHe brought Emerson on to play 5 at the back. Wonder if Ange has learnt from the Chelsea game that when the opposition have a numerical advantage but you have a score line to defend, there is no shame in trying to defend it and it doesn't undermine the way you want to play when you have 11 v 11.
He brought Emerson on to play 5 at the back. Wonder if Ange has learnt from the Chelsea game that when the opposition have a numerical advantage but you have a score line to defend, there is no shame in trying to defend it and it doesn't undermine the way you want to play when you have 11 v 11.
Not sure about that - I think it was a response to them bringing on Wood to increase the numbers they had up top to challenge for crosses. Sensible move at 2-0 up if you ask me, so I am not being critical of Ange, just pointing out that perhaps he has privately reflected on the "even if we only have 5 players we're still gonna have a go, mate" philosophy and is now prepared to be more pragmatic in any given game situation.Possibly, but then I think if he had a world class forward option on the bench he would have gone with them instead
The other thing being we had a 2 goal lead last night with 20 minutes left to play rather than chasing the game, so something real to defend.Not sure about that - I think it was a response to them bringing on Wood to increase the numbers they had up top to challenge for crosses. Sensible move at 2-0 up if you ask me, so I am not being critical of Ange, just pointing out that perhaps he has privately reflected on the "even if we only have 5 players we're still gonna have a go, mate" philosophy and is now prepared to be more pragmatic in any given game situation.
Yes, I thought the 10 men had a more defensive look to it than usual..and fairly effective too.He brought Emerson on to play 5 at the back. Wonder if Ange has learnt from the Chelsea game that when the opposition have a numerical advantage but you have a score line to defend, there is no shame in trying to defend it and it doesn't undermine the way you want to play when you have 11 v 11.
It was 1-1 when we went down to 9 men v Chelsea, so we had a point (and at the time our undefeated record) to defend.The other thing being we had a 2 goal lead last night with 20 minutes left to play rather than chasing the game, so something real to defend.
He brought Emerson on to play 5 at the back. Wonder if Ange has learnt from the Chelsea game that when the opposition have a numerical advantage but you have a score line to defend, there is no shame in trying to defend it and it doesn't undermine the way you want to play when you have 11 v 11.
Yeah fair pointIt was 1-1 when we went down to 9 men v Chelsea, so we had a point (and at the time our undefeated record) to defend.
You're wreckless until you've found one. Since no one on Spurs has a sunken pirate ship, we are indeed wreckless.Sunken pirate ships would be wrecks. So technically we'd be hunting floating pirate ships.
View attachment 135334
He seems to be getting on like a house on fire with Levy at the womens game this afternoon
He seems to be getting on like a house on fire with Levy at the womens game this afternoon
We did exactly the same away at Luton when down to 10. The Chelsea game was a very specific, unique situation, that has been blown massively out of proportion, and treated as if it's the way we play every game, which it just isn't.He brought Emerson on to play 5 at the back. Wonder if Ange has learnt from the Chelsea game that when the opposition have a numerical advantage but you have a score line to defend, there is no shame in trying to defend it and it doesn't undermine the way you want to play when you have 11 v 11.
Yea hated reading that, absolutely no need for him to say that, prick.Great Neville starting already saying City should be looking at Ange when Pep leaves. Fuck off! Been here less than 6 months and pricks like that spouting shit that all the other lemmings in the media will start rinse and repeating
Yea it’s more just been a few misstimed and reckless tackles but it’s not like our team are punching players and lashing out week after week.Also this lack of discipline thing just isn't true.
A bold assumption sir!You're wreckless until you've found one. Since no one on Spurs has a sunken pirate ship, we are indeed wreckless.
He seems to be getting on like a house on fire with Levy at the womens game this afternoon