How is City our close competitor? What is it now? 14pts. And we're only a third of the season in. Our close competitor at the moment is Watford TBH.What can i clear up for you?
No I was referring to Utd & just saying it’s bad enough we strengthened City ... we shouldn’t now strengthen UtdHow is City our close competitor? What is it now? 14pts. And we're only a third of the season in. Our close competitor at the moment is Watford TBH.
They weren't 14 points clear when we sold Walker to them though, were they?How is City our close competitor? What is it now? 14pts. And we're only a third of the season in. Our close competitor at the moment is Watford TBH.
Fine, fine, tucheThey weren't 14 points clear when we sold Walker to them though, were they?
They had just finished their second season in a row of finishing behind us.
Never gonna happen. This actually is a pretty fair deal. It's nothing like the Campbell Berba deal. For one thing Shaw would be permament, has experience and can still be moulded into a top LB.
Define "loads"?
From what i have seen he has had one ankle injury since returning from breaking his leg. I make that two, although to bolster your argument "loads" would suit you i guess?
If you against selling Rose then say so but don't make shit up.
Because it seems Rose doesn't want to be here. IF we were to do this deal, I'd say it's fair.I agree it would be a long shot but Rose is already a top left back and we don't need the money.. So why let them have Rose just so we can work on Shaw, dosnt make any sense.
It sounds totally made up to me.
No I was referring to Utd & just saying it’s bad enough we strengthened City ... we shouldn’t now strengthen Utd
Walker going to City may benefit them but hasn't been a major factor in them being fourteen points clear, indeed when we buy players for thirty million who can't kick a ball straight one could say we have weakened our side by the quality of some of the players we have brought in.