Kyle Naughton to Norwich City (Loan)
- Thread starter Supersi32
- Start date
chrissivad
Staff
- May 20, 2005
- 51,646
- 58,072
- Staff
- #2
Kyle Naughton
QPR set to miss out on Spurs defender
QPR look set to miss out on Tottenham Hotspur defender Kyle Naughton after Norwich City hijacked the deal at the 11th hour.
Rangers were lining up a loan move for the full-back, who played under boss Neil Warnock at Sheffield United.
But Norwich look to have beaten QPR to the 22-year-old after agreeing a fee with Spurs.
http://www.fulhamchronicle.co.uk/lo...09/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter
QPR set to miss out on Spurs defender
QPR look set to miss out on Tottenham Hotspur defender Kyle Naughton after Norwich City hijacked the deal at the 11th hour.
Rangers were lining up a loan move for the full-back, who played under boss Neil Warnock at Sheffield United.
But Norwich look to have beaten QPR to the 22-year-old after agreeing a fee with Spurs.
http://www.fulhamchronicle.co.uk/lo...09/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter
Dan Ashcroft
Manstack vs The Gay Chimney
- Jan 6, 2008
- 6,404
- 1,147
I posted this weeks ago, but a friend of mine with connections at Leicester said we'd told them he was theirs for £4m. They seemed to think he'd end up at QPR though.
Not sure he's a Norwich type signing or in their price range tbh.
DoublePivot
Relegated to Lurker
- Jul 1, 2005
- 8,987
- 67
4 million is what we spent. It's not like Levy to break even on a kid.
chrissivad
Staff
- May 20, 2005
- 51,646
- 58,072
- Staff
- #6
could it not be that the fee that has been agreed is the fee for the loan, rather than the sale of Naughton?
#1 Spur
Member
- Feb 4, 2009
- 608
- 10
Is agreeing a loan fee newsworthy?
The fees generally aren't so much as mentioned throughout the course of the loan anyway!
chrissivad
Staff
- May 20, 2005
- 51,646
- 58,072
- Staff
- #8
nowhere in that article it says that Norwich will sign him.
It says the have hijacked the deal
The deal being: Rangers were lining up a loan move
So yes, the fee is news worthy if it means he would go to Norwich instead of QPR
It says the have hijacked the deal
The deal being: Rangers were lining up a loan move
So yes, the fee is news worthy if it means he would go to Norwich instead of QPR
#1 Spur
Member
- Feb 4, 2009
- 608
- 10
When you put it like that then I suppose it is possible :wink:
chrissivad
Staff
- May 20, 2005
- 51,646
- 58,072
chrissivad
Staff
- May 20, 2005
- 51,646
- 58,072
- Staff
- #13
and there is the proof
JackTheYid
Active Member
- Mar 21, 2004
- 780
- 184
I don't mind this deal, would have preferred to sell as IMO, I don't think he is/will be quite good enough. However, if he has a great year with Norwich in the Prem then it means we can steal him back, or if Walker proves a hit, we can ask for a lot more money (Levy will be salivating at the thought of this!).
DoublePivot
Relegated to Lurker
- Jul 1, 2005
- 8,987
- 67
If this is the big movements by Friday, it's a little deflating
hughy
I'm SUPER cereal.
- Nov 18, 2007
- 31,953
- 57,236
Quite exciting compared to the absolute fucking drivel we've had to live off recently.
DoublePivot
Relegated to Lurker
- Jul 1, 2005
- 8,987
- 67
We have 14 without Naughton.
An excellent move imo. He is a young player with a lot of potential who will now have a chance to prove himself in the premiership which can only be good for us. If he proves he is good enough then we get back a player with PL experience and if he isnt good enough then we ll move him on.
degoose
Well-Known Member
- Jul 3, 2004
- 2,833
- 3,014
thats if he gets in ahead of russell martin who has been awesome for norwich for the last two seasons. I hope he does but Martin was one of the most consistent players for norwich last year. It will be tough
