What's new

Harry Kane

delawarespur

Well-Known Member
Aug 8, 2019
2,376
13,400
Tbh with the reporting of a fee agreed without a ā€œhere we goā€ always smelled fishy to me. Especially as the personal terms were supposedly the part that was agreed ages ago. Like Bayern and even spurs to an extent were putting pressure on Kane to accept the deal when he was increasingly doubtful of leaving. I guess weā€™ll see. The end to this whole thing (either way) canā€™t come soon enough.
 

wiggo24

Well-Known Member
Jan 5, 2013
5,091
36,808
Pacqueta now subject to a bid of over 100m euros from City. Kane fee is nowhere near enough tbh. Praying he stays now.
 

Jules77

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2008
1,227
1,284
Thatā€™s probably just Kafefe Solediabicol reading Twitter and passing it on.


Itā€™s funny to think this guy actually knows what Harry is leaning towards doing. The only way this is leaked is by Charlie trying to squeeze more out of the personal terms. Not saying heā€™s going, but the thought there is someone in the room leaking Kaneā€™s sentiment as he paces his living room is next level itk bs.
 

KirstyG

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2015
1,049
4,354
So why not be the beneficiary of his talents for one mere season? F88K the money, the club generates plenty and still doesn't fund any team re-builds like it should without the Kane money......
Never said we shouldnā€™t. Just saying if after 12months he goes to Chelsea we will know that his pocket will rule his heart. Itā€™s the FANS that care deeply about clubs not necessarily the players.
 

Jlimbac0

Serial Lurker
Aug 19, 2021
144
322
Personally as a fan Iā€™m happy if Kane is staying, but this would be a huge fuck you to levy. This smacks of Harry and his camp walking for free due to levy breaking the ā€œgentlemanā€™sā€ agreement 2 years back.
Screw that agreement. City priced themselves out of it by paying 100m for Grealish and then low balling for Kane.
 
Top