What's new

Harry Kane

Amnesiac503

Well-Known Member
Jul 17, 2014
130
559

srups34

Well-Known Member
Jun 11, 2008
2,595
5,477
Whoever is playing policeman with ITK’s on this. Deal was agreed Friday. Not going to expand why we are where we are at. We know the reasons for the about turn. Certainly not sharing that here.
Oh ffs. At least gives us a cryptic 😜
 

TheChosenOne

A dislike or neg rep = fat fingers
Dec 13, 2005
48,125
50,146

Looks like it’s Sketchers, so the Adidas deal conspiracy theories can be put to rest.

I could probably live very well on just that endorsement ££ bundle
 

gibbospurs

SC Supporter
Aug 28, 2010
4,992
6,622

Goofster

Well-Known Member
Aug 4, 2011
393
809
But why would he sign a deal with a release clause of any amount when at the moment he has a release clause of zero
Signing a new deal would obviously bump his wages, and probably by a significant amount. It would also provide some sort of security in the case he would be hit by a serious injury for example. So it's not completely impossible that in the case he won't get sold this window that he would opt to sign a new contract just to provide security for himself. The clause however would probably have to be a lot lower than what you would hope to get paid for a player of his quality and not exclusively for abroad teams.
 

brendanb50

Well-Known Member
Jul 21, 2005
4,488
3,895
And if Harry stays and go on free next season he will be remembered for losing 100 million worth player to Chelsea, Man U or even Arsenal, simply damned if he does damned if he doesn’t
Agree with losing the money part, completely disagree on the idea he joins the scum or Chelsea. United seemed like a reasonable shout before they signed Hojlund, now if he settles it seems a less likely move as well.
 

Tezza1978

Well-Known Member
Jun 3, 2021
749
2,984
7v1575.jpg
 

dvdhopeful

SC Supporter
Nov 10, 2006
7,614
6,035
Everything....everything we know about Kane rules out Chelsea and obviously Arsenal, not sure why it's always being brought up as a nightmare scenario.
 

Dakes

DNA of the Tottenham
Jan 28, 2020
2,285
7,799

Looks like it’s Sketchers, so the Adidas deal conspiracy theories can be put to rest.
Those boots enabled him to score an incredible number of goals yesterday. The way forward (pardon the pun) might be Skechers rather than Kane.

Slap these babies on Richie, Dane, Alejo and Gift.
 

Yid-ol

Just-outside Edinburgh
Jan 16, 2006
31,168
19,421
But why would he sign a deal with a release clause of any amount when at the moment he has a release clause of zero

Been a few things mentioned before on this, not sure how true they are though.

Apparently Kane wants us to get some fee for him. Plus if we agree set amounts that we would sell for he knows how he can move and get a bumper pay for a season or two.

I know release amounts in Spain ECT are on one go though, so not sure if his might be different.
 
Last edited:

Hoddle&Waddle

Well-Known Member
Nov 25, 2012
8,348
17,585
I think we will miss Kane more than the poxy 85 million quid.

Starting to think fuck it, let's roll the dice and hopefully have a fantastic season.
 

Yid-ol

Just-outside Edinburgh
Jan 16, 2006
31,168
19,421
Those boots enabled him to score an incredible number of goals yesterday. The way forward (pardon the pun) might be Skechers rather than Kane.

Slap these babies on Richie, Dane, Alejo and Gift.

Dane scored more per minute than kane yesterday......if you want to break it down also :cautious: :sneaky:
 
Top