- Jan 8, 2021
- 1,020
- 4,111
Who said this?Also, from one of their ITKs:
Charlie has clearly not learned his lesson yet...
Who said this?Also, from one of their ITKs:
Charlie has clearly not learned his lesson yet...
I was about the write exactly this,. Why is it in anyone's interest to make the bigger teams so elite they are untouchable. Baffles me why the media are so desperate for this to happen.
Im obviously not an expert, but would City really be ok with agreeing for him to play at the weekend if a deal had been agreed between the clubs?
Has Neville got a CK66 sponsorship deal we don't know about?
Who said this?
Yup they are also saying something about AP McCoy being the horse racing ITK source today as he was at the Charlie Kane wedding
Am I right in thinking not a single one of our ITKs, on here or anywhere else, have said Kane will leave or City have bidded what we want?
Complete contrast to what some of the City ITKs are saying.
Ok, no haven’t seen the doc or read the book. Thanks for clarifying! Not a bad output for someone just coasting ?I would assume you've not read his book or watched interviews, but prior to his move to Inter he was the epitome of the 'talent without effort'. He realised, through Raiola, that he had to work hard to extract every drop of talent, and shouldn't waste it by coasting and just being 'good'.
I think it was Raiola saying something like "Why would any of the best teams want you if you don't even want it yourself?"
Ahh Mr Moonchester himself!That Tolmie's hairdoo guy.
The poster has not claimed it is from AP McCoy, he said it's from a mate who works in the horse racing industry (mucks out the horses no doubt).If you google AP McCoy and Harry Kane there are zero photos of them together at any social event. You'd think if they were close they'd be at least one. If a poster is going to make something up, you'd think they'd do a tiny bit of research beforehand.
There's an argument that there's a symbiotic relationship and mutual interest between the TV companies and United, especially, remaining a top team. There was an article or commentary about this at the time of Poch being linked with a move there. It would be interesting to read it again but from memory it was stating that Sky et al get a lot of financial/marketing advantages in promoting United and other top teams and therefore banging the 'Kane to x' or 'Poch to United' drum serves their own interest and is not only saying it for the sake of it.
Been wondering for a while...why is there no betting on HK transfer? Not with Sky or Ladbrokes anyway.
He’s paid by Sky. His job is to get people clicking links, watching TV, talking about what he says. Which do you think is better for him from that perspective: saying what he did or “Harry Kane to knuckle down and quietly get back to work”?Since being their mouthpiece over the ESL debacle Neville seems to be getting a bit above his station at Sky Sports imo and having a bit of an influence pushing agendas. Wtf is this shite Gary Neville says Manchester United should move for Tottenham striker Harry Kane during final week of transfer window | Football News | Sky Sports
Fucking hypocrite.
The poster has not claimed it is from AP McCoy, he said it's from a mate who works in the horse racing industry (mucks out the horses no doubt).
That's all well and good. But he tells Pogba to knuckle down and get on with it.He’s paid by Sky. His job is to get people clicking links, watching TV, talking about what he says. Which do you think is better for him from that perspective: saying what he did or “Harry Kane to knuckle down and quietly get back to work”?
The media don’t have a specific ‘Agenda’, except to say whatever it is they think that will get the most reactions/wind people up most. Judging by this thread, it’s working
That's brilliant!