If people really think kane has been under par due to a positional change they are being incredibly generous to him. Played furthest forward today and looked no better. Not sure why people can’t just admit he’s been poor by his own very high standards and stop making excuses for him.
Today he played further forward, but the only way he'd have to clear chances were if he were able to pick up a deflection of a cross or something.If people really think kane has been under par due to a positional change they are being incredibly generous to him. Played furthest forward today and looked no better. Not sure why people can’t just admit he’s been poor by his own very high standards and stop making excuses for him. Tbh just shows his class that he’s somehow managed 6 goals when he’s been at about 70%.
Called it during the game, how on earth we didn’t get a corner I’ll never know.I actually called it at the time and I've got dodgy eyes. I was watching in a little Spanish bar and didn't understand the commentary, I just assumed they were analysing the save every time they replayed it. I now kind of understand the over the top trolling by Liverpool fans - pure ignorance as usual.
Perhaps Southgate had a feeling that the players he had in the squad were going to struggle to feed Kane - come to think of it how many times did Sterling or Lingard make the completely wrong pass?! Therefore he felt that getting Kane on the ball deeper was a way to obtain possession higher up the pitch rather than try pass our way up top.I'm still completely baffled as to why you wouldn't build your team around the in form striker in the world, and enable him as much as possible. It's on a par with Hodgson having him take corners by playing him as a playmaker to enable far inferior players like Sterling and Lingaard.