What's new

Harry Kane

whitechina

Well-Known Member
Dec 27, 2012
4,277
9,246
0-0 with 2 minutes to go
Send on Harry
Pen to England Harry scores it
One touch , one goal. England win
Job done
 

tommo84

Proud to be loud
Aug 15, 2005
6,228
11,312


That statement by Southgate actually makes me feel more strongly about it - if he’s been struggling since Wednesday then quite simply he’s not fit so he should be sent back to Spurs with Wednesday’s game out of the question.
 

Rosco1984

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
1,743
7,056
this all feels to me like Gareth and Jose have come to an agreement after Southgate invited him to call him. They've all come up with a convenient way to rest him whilst still being around as the captain and in case of emergency without anyone looking to have backed down and lost face in the press. If southgate just hadn't have picked him he would have been called weak but the slight cramp/muscle fatigue in training story gives him a way out.
 

spursfan77

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2005
46,690
104,977
That statement by Southgate actually makes me feel more strongly about it - if he’s been struggling since Wednesday then quite simply he’s not fit so he should be sent back to Spurs with Wednesday’s game out of the question.

Southgate is even more stupid than I think he is if Kane is played today. It’s a fucking friendly. If it was us with a competitive game today and he hadn’t trained all week we probably wouldn’t even play him.
 

Dov67

Well-Known Member
Jul 1, 2005
3,377
10,489
We'd play him at 60% fit too, I don't see why it should be any different.

because he's contracted to us. We developed him, we trained, we pay him £200k/week, we suffer potentially tens of millions of losses in forfeited champions league money should he get injured playing a bullshit nothing friendly against Wales, and be unavailable to us for several weeks or months.

Are you saying Southgate's attitude should be that that THFC can go f**k themselves, I'll do what I want? If that is his attitude, then our club and every other major Prem club will not cooperate and look to pull players at every opportunity.
 

EQP

EQP
Sep 1, 2013
8,050
29,941
We'd play him at 60% fit too, I don't see why it should be any different.

The risk isn't equal though. If Spurs lose Kane to long term injury, we have to rely on Vinicius and maybe go into the January market to find a replacement. If England lose Kane to injury, they get to choose from the best English players in the world, at no significant cost to themselves, to come in and try and replace him.
 

BringBack_leGin

Well-Known Member
Jul 28, 2004
27,719
54,929
Not enough rightbacks for my liking.
Of only he had options we had when Harry was at club. Walker Naughton Hutton Corluka all specialist there while Kahoot and Livermore both got minutes there too, and under the previous lunatic manager even Huddlestone and Bentley had a go at right back.
 

C0YS

Just another member
Jul 9, 2007
12,780
13,817
The risk isn't equal though. If Spurs lose Kane to long term injury, we have to rely on Vinicius and maybe go into the January market to find a replacement. If England lose Kane to injury, they get to choose from the best English players in the world, at no significant cost to themselves, to come in and try and replace him.
From an England perspective they'd lose their captain and quite possibly star player. The fact that we might have to rely on other players should be of no concern to England. I mean look, I get it, I want Kane to be right for spurs, but from an England perspective they can throw in the same sort of stuff back at you. Like, what do you expect?
 
Top