What's new

Harry Kane

Timberwolf

Well-Known Member
Jan 17, 2008
10,328
50,217

Not a chance in hell any of those 3 leave this summer. All of them have 3/4 years left on their contracts and there's 0% chance anyone will pay the Levy tax required. Would take something ludicrous like 200m for anyone to sign Kane atm and who's gonna pay that?

EDIT: I don't mind the neg ratings but I'm genuinely curious - why do you think this is dumb? Can you seriously see any of these players leaving this summer?! Seems blindingly obvious to me that they won't.
 
Last edited:

Dirtysanchez6

Well-Known Member
May 15, 2018
1,455
5,638
I think it's too early to be saying that. Most of his injuries were from heavy tackles and not a recurrence of a previous injury. It's clear he needed a long rest, which he's now got, so it'll be a case of wait, see and hope for a bit of luck.
Ankle injury is reoccurring once you’ve done that a few times it’s becomes suspect to happening again
 

yankspurs

Enic Out
Aug 22, 2013
41,970
71,398
Ankle injury is reoccurring once you’ve done that a few times it’s becomes suspect to happening again
Part of the problem is that Harry’s gotten into the habit of rushing himself back slot sooner than anyone would think. Perhaps this layoff will have been good for letting it actually heel.
 

BigMac50

New Member
Jun 19, 2020
1
0
As an avid Spurs fan we appear to be struggling to attract an 'out an out' decent striker - a proper forward - as they don't want to sit on the bench for most of the season all the while Harry Kane is fit - understandable....

What about moving Harry back into a no.10 position (just off the main striker) allowing us to buy a main striker with Harry in support - what a threat that would be to defences

I have watched games where Harry is comfortable on the ball, he has control, a range of passes, always happy to get back and defend, a good engine on him, passionate in a tackle, can take players on etc etc.......the talent is endless perfect for that no.10 role

I would be happy to sacrifice a few existing Spurs midfielders to make this happen and maybe raise a few quid in the process by moving them on?

Thoughts?
 

thekneaf

Well-Known Member
Jan 18, 2011
1,935
3,878
As an avid Spurs fan we appear to be struggling to attract an 'out an out' decent striker - a proper forward - as they don't want to sit on the bench for most of the season all the while Harry Kane is fit - understandable....

What about moving Harry back into a no.10 position (just off the main striker) allowing us to buy a main striker with Harry in support - what a threat that would be to defences

I have watched games where Harry is comfortable on the ball, he has control, a range of passes, always happy to get back and defend, a good engine on him, passionate in a tackle, can take players on etc etc.......the talent is endless perfect for that no.10 role

I would be happy to sacrifice a few existing Spurs midfielders to make this happen and maybe raise a few quid in the process by moving them on?

Thoughts?
About 800 pages of them
 

Hakkz

Svensk hetsporre
Jul 6, 2012
8,196
17,270
Part of the problem is that Harry’s gotten into the habit of rushing himself back slot sooner than anyone would think. Perhaps this layoff will have been good for letting it actually heel.

You need some time toe get well. :sneaky:
 

nidge

Sand gets everywhere!!!!!
Staff
Jul 27, 2004
24,868
11,368
My worry is that he didn't just look like he was lacking match fitness, it looked worse than that. He looked gassed after 60 minutes and that was after a pretty non-existant first half.
 

Yiddo100

Well-Known Member
Jan 16, 2019
9,925
52,118
My worry is that he didn't just look like he was lacking match fitness, it looked worse than that. He looked gassed after 60 minutes and that was after a pretty non-existant first half.
I think I can excuse him being gassed after 60 minutes after 6 months out
 
Top