I know, that's not the point I was making. My point was that some of the same people who are criticising Kane for not pulling out of that tackle are the same ones who are constantly moaning in the match threads about how Eriksen always pulls out of 50/50s. I was just pointing out the irony is all.
Just think he’s got too much to offer at his relatively young age, that’ll happen eventually I’d imagine, but not till he’s at least approaching 30 imo.Thought struck me on Tuesday night, and apologies if someone else has said this here already.
Might this latest injury prove to be a tipping point that leads Pochettino to withdraw Kane into a deeper, Sheringham type role behind an out and out striker? With the latter having to cope with the hassle that comes from leading the line (being monstered by yobs like Fernandinho) while Kane pulls the strings from deep, a la the pass against Liverpool in the lead-up to the Sissoko chance?
Kane has frequently been described as half-Shearer, half-Sheringham. Due to the injuries, is he reaching a stage in his career where he needs to tailor his game?
Discuss. (If you can be bothered.)
Just think he’s got too much to offer at his relatively young age, that’ll happen eventually I’d imagine, but not till he’s at least approaching 30 imo.
Wouldn't dropping deeper mean he spends more time being monstered by yobs like Fernandinho? If Kane was up top, leading the line, for the whole game, he wouldn't be anywhere near Fernandinho. Likewise, he wouldn't have been sliding into a challenge with Delph and getting himself injured.Thought struck me on Tuesday night, and apologies if someone else has said this here already.
Might this latest injury prove to be a tipping point that leads Pochettino to withdraw Kane into a deeper, Sheringham type role behind an out and out striker? With the latter having to cope with the hassle that comes from leading the line (being monstered by yobs like Fernandinho) while Kane pulls the strings from deep, a la the pass against Liverpool in the lead-up to the Sissoko chance?
Kane has frequently been described as half-Shearer, half-Sheringham. Due to the injuries, is he reaching a stage in his career where he needs to tailor his game?
Discuss. (If you can be bothered.)
The ankle didn't bend much, not like last time, I reckon he just trod on a nerve. He will be back in 2 weeks max
Thought struck me on Tuesday night, and apologies if someone else has said this here already.
Might this latest injury prove to be a tipping point that leads Pochettino to withdraw Kane into a deeper, Sheringham type role behind an out and out striker? With the latter having to cope with the hassle that comes from leading the line (being monstered by yobs like Fernandinho) while Kane pulls the strings from deep, a la the pass against Liverpool in the lead-up to the Sissoko chance?
Kane has frequently been described as half-Shearer, half-Sheringham. Due to the injuries, is he reaching a stage in his career where he needs to tailor his game?
Discuss. (If you can be bothered.)
He's a fucking goal machine like Roy Race ffs! Get him as close to the box as possible and keep giving him the ball!
Nothing timescale-wise yet about the ankle? Couldn't find anything, any ITK anywhere?
Less training on shooting drills, more training with Eriksen...As we have witnessed he is a very quick healer, just look back on his past exact same injuries. I only hope he learns that some tackles are not required....
My money says H will be back for Brighton at home....
I kind of agree but often when he starts up top with Kane he's not roaming and not involved enough. It's usually Kane dropping off and Son has to almost do less in order to be available as a lead striker. Alongside Llorente he actually did better because Llorente plays furthest forward (he's a lot less mobile than Kane) with Son able to drop off more and get more involved. So for me if he plays a false 9 we would be better off with Llorente up top, if not I would play Son as a support attacker on either wing so he can run with the ball. I would worry if he was the focal point up top because he doesn't get involved enough. So when Kane returns I think he needs to be one of the 3 in a 4231 becaus ehe doesn't work as well in a 2 with Kane.Son is a better player when he is given freedom to roam around in the last 3rd. Thats what made him score loads of goals when harry was absent. So he shpuld be given the false 9 role rather than being put on the left. He can play together with lucas in a more fluid 4132 formation, with sissoko, eriksen and alli behind them.
VY is most likely just stating his opinion but he is also ITK.Is there any ITK backing that money or just onions?
Even if not ITK, he’d not say it if it was JUST wishful thinking imvhoIs there any ITK backing that money or just onions?