Grade E for Elite or Error? Spurs Striker Verdict
- Thread starter mawspurs
- Start date
FloridaSpur
Well-Known Member
- Jun 21, 2021
- 1,112
- 2,784
Never has been prolific, and never will be.
Still amazed at the money we paid for him. No doubt another huge loss on a player when we try and sell him next Summer.
Still amazed at the money we paid for him. No doubt another huge loss on a player when we try and sell him next Summer.
Cinemattis
Fully Functional Member
- Aug 5, 2013
- 960
- 3,732
Tiresome how these “journalists” and “experts” constantly rate Richy as a failure because of his poor stats - for a nine. “As a nine he should score more” etc.
The fact is that before this season, he never played as a nine for us (bar a few cup matches - with the B-team).
Fact number two: his second preferred position is wide left forward. Left.
What was his position for us in +90% of his last year matches? Out on the right. With a dysfunctional team behind him: the midfield was a mess and none of the right wingbacks were much more than abysmal.
In fact: ALL our players except Kane (and Benta before injury) was below par or worse last year. To rate a player played out of position in a dysfunctional team is just stupid.
The article and the rating it is based on:
Grade: F - Friggin stupid.
The fact is that before this season, he never played as a nine for us (bar a few cup matches - with the B-team).
Fact number two: his second preferred position is wide left forward. Left.
What was his position for us in +90% of his last year matches? Out on the right. With a dysfunctional team behind him: the midfield was a mess and none of the right wingbacks were much more than abysmal.
In fact: ALL our players except Kane (and Benta before injury) was below par or worse last year. To rate a player played out of position in a dysfunctional team is just stupid.
The article and the rating it is based on:
Grade: F - Friggin stupid.
Similar threads
