What's new

Conor Gallagher

Styopa

Well-Known Member
Jan 19, 2014
5,349
14,808
They don’t really play the same position though.

Exactly. And it’s easy to see how one could work well within Ange’s system whereas the other is a bit of an awkward fit.

I’ve always rated Hojbjerg and I think the amount of stick he gets on here is way over the top. But it makes sense why we would want to sell him and why we would want to buy Gallagher, irrespective of which one is supposedly the “better” player.
 
Last edited:

danny32

Well-Known Member
Apr 9, 2004
650
3,273
Think this one's dead for this window and then it's a question of whether Chelsea offer him a new contract.
I think they will.
 

KeithStone

Well-Known Member
Aug 22, 2013
194
900
Think this one's dead for this window and then it's a question of whether Chelsea offer him a new contract.
I think they will.
I think they’ll have to. If they don’t, they’ll risk losing him for nothing which only makes their FFP situation even worse.
 

Ghost Hardware

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
18,343
63,071
Think this one's dead for this window and then it's a question of whether Chelsea offer him a new contract.
I think they will.
I reckon we will continue to monitor him but I also think we aren't so pressed about it. I really don't see us spending £25/30 mil on Nusa then getting Gallagher for £40 mil in one window, not that Chelsea will even come down to that price. I'm also not convinced he is necessarily the same priority he might have been in summer due to Sarr performing as well as he has. Personally I still struggle to see PEH going this window but ether way if we do bring in a CM I reckon it will be prospect signing rather then a bigger money buy.
 

DogsOfWar

Well-Known Member
Jan 12, 2005
2,303
3,644
I still think that it's an opportunist deal, we believe he may be available for well under market value due to Chelsea's financial circumstances.
I think that's why we've shifted focus. If we get Nusa we move on Gil, and if Chelsea crack we get Gallagher and move on PEH.
If they don't I wouldn't be surprised if we just went for Emerson and moved PEH on.

Just feels like Ange has a clear vision for the squad and is happy to accept either the available or the 'value' player to speed up the process.
 

Ron Burgundy

SC Supporter
Jun 19, 2008
7,739
23,414
I still think that it's an opportunist deal, we believe he may be available for well under market value due to Chelsea's financial circumstances.
I think that's why we've shifted focus. If we get Nusa we move on Gil, and if Chelsea crack we get Gallagher and move on PEH.
If they don't I wouldn't be surprised if we just went for Emerson and moved PEH on.

Just feels like Ange has a clear vision for the squad and is happy to accept either the available or the 'value' player to speed up the process.
I think that’s largely right. Though I’d be inclined to shift PEH if we get the chance anyway. Once people are back (end by of the month?) we’ll be well stocked in his position.

Gallaghers value is only going to go down too. Might be better to look at him in the summer
 

DogsOfWar

Well-Known Member
Jan 12, 2005
2,303
3,644
I think that’s largely right. Though I’d be inclined to shift PEH if we get the chance anyway. Once people are back (end by of the month?) we’ll be well stocked in his position.

Gallaghers value is only going to go down too. Might be better to look at him in the summer
My thoughts too, I think we might go back in for Kelly then as well.
Although there might be a bit more competition in the Summer.
Hopefully, we can get CL football and become an even more attractive proposition.
 

Steffen

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
1,077
4,508
Top