What's new

Race for The Top 10

ItsBoris

Well-Known Member
Jan 18, 2011
7,900
9,301
Do you honestly think the team is anywhere near their previous standards? Key players like Dele, Kane, Vertonghen, Son and Toby are light years away from the form they showed when we were ripping up the CL. As you say we've also lost Eriksen - the single most important player to the way we played. N'Dombele doesn't even count - he's not only not superior on form to any of our previous players, the guy isn't even playing. Lo Celso is brilliant and Bergwijn shows promise - those two do not make up for the massive degradation of the squad, and we absolutely do not play anything like the same way we did when Poch's teams were smashing the likes of Madrid.

We're only arguably stronger on paper if you're playing Football Manager and you're basing everything off player stats. We are not the same team we were and I'm not sure why you'd think we are?

Didn't you see us in the CL this year? We absolutely scraped through most games and got roundly smashed a total of 14 - 3 by two German teams. We are nowhere near the level required to be able to make any sort of success of a CL campaign as well as the PL and domestic cups.

We have absolutely no chance of winning 7 in a row this season and we'll be nowhere near the CL spots.

I'm not sure what football you've been watching this year but it sounds like your season has gone a lot better than mine.

Why do you think that is? They just suddenly lost all their skill? I don't think so - for me we lost our mojo, our confidence. That's what we had last season that we miss this season. Even with Eriksen for half a season we weren't playing well, so that's not the critical variable. I think Lo Celso adequately replaces him anyway.

Our players are plenty good enough. Sure some upgrades would be nice. But if you compare our team to Wolves, Arsenal, Sheffield, Leicester - we're miles better. I wouldn't trade our squad for Arsenal's in a million years, and that's not because of bias. In terms of quality players we're around the United/Chelsea level (and a bit better than Chelsea before their additions of Werner and Ziyech imo).

Point is to say that we don't belong in the Champions league when we're the current runner ups with mostly the same squad is fairly ridiculous imo. I get that sentiment is negative right now but some perspective is needed.
 

Goobers

Well-Known Member
Jul 29, 2011
1,979
3,193
I think it may (just) be too much of a stretch for the CL this year ( how that 7 game run has hurt us) but no Europe is unacceptable. I would hope we can make EL depending on who wins the FA Cup and CL. If so I think José targets that as potentially his first bit of silverware. I wouldn’t be upset with that at all. I think that’s where we are as a squad and club right now.
 

Marty

Audere est farce
Mar 10, 2005
40,173
63,894
Just by the by, most of you know this but this is what we know about European qualification for next season.

Man City's League Cup win means the European place has gone 6th in the League. Assuming City's ban is upheld at least for one season, that means 6th and 7th go into the Europa League as things stand. If a team finishing 7th or higher wins the FA Cup, 8th gets into an early qualifying round of the EL.

We're not finishing lower than 7th IMO. Sheffield United are collapsing, even take out the Man Utd game they took one point off Villa and Newcastle so I'm confident they're going to tail off now. That means we "just" have to keep the current chasers behind us and we will have European football next season.

The NLD is the biggie, as it so often is.
 

mpickard2087

Patient Zero
Jun 13, 2008
21,889
32,562
Don't get the hate for the Europa League, at the very least it gives us an opportunity to watch more Spurs/football matches against different opposition, and the excuses that we should sack it off are poor.

It might not be the competition to be in, but big clubs just get on with it and demonstrate why they are that. Say what you want about them, but all of Utd, Chelsea, Arsenal, and Liverpool in recent years have won or at least come extremely close to winning it. Everything about Spurs - the club, players/manager, fans - though treat the competition as if it's beneath them. And we really are in no position to be acting like that.

I've said before that the Europa League for me is a good test of the overall health of a football club. Take away the gun XI and have you built a solid squad with decent back up options able to come in and perform? How is the youth academy doing, have you got people who can come into these games and show something? etc. You can use it for your benefit and shine a light on whether overall the football club as a whole is doing as good as it thinks it is.
 
Last edited:

homer hotspur

Well-Known Member
Dec 7, 2014
2,901
4,681
Why do you think that is? They just suddenly lost all their skill? I don't think so - for me we lost our mojo, our confidence. That's what we had last season that we miss this season. Even with Eriksen for half a season we weren't playing well, so that's not the critical variable. I think Lo Celso adequately replaces him anyway.

Our players are plenty good enough. Sure some upgrades would be nice. But if you compare our team to Wolves, Arsenal, Sheffield, Leicester - we're miles better. I wouldn't trade our squad for Arsenal's in a million years, and that's not because of bias. In terms of quality players we're around the United/Chelsea level (and a bit better than Chelsea before their additions of Werner and Ziyech imo).

Point is to say that we don't belong in the Champions league when we're the current runner ups with mostly the same squad is fairly ridiculous imo. I get that sentiment is negative right now but some perspective is needed.
Sorry to say but I don't think we are miles better than wolves and Leicester squads now at all and have steadily fallen behind those of Chelsea and Man Utd .
 

Trotter

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2009
2,169
3,312
Why do you think that is? They just suddenly lost all their skill? I don't think so - for me we lost our mojo, our confidence. That's what we had last season that we miss this season. Even with Eriksen for half a season we weren't playing well, so that's not the critical variable. I think Lo Celso adequately replaces him anyway.

Our players are plenty good enough. Sure some upgrades would be nice. But if you compare our team to Wolves, Arsenal, Sheffield, Leicester - we're miles better. I wouldn't trade our squad for Arsenal's in a million years, and that's not because of bias. In terms of quality players we're around the United/Chelsea level (and a bit better than Chelsea before their additions of Werner and Ziyech imo).

Point is to say that we don't belong in the Champions league when we're the current runner ups with mostly the same squad is fairly ridiculous imo. I get that sentiment is negative right now but some perspective is needed.

Lo Celso, who has no goals or assists replaces someone that got roughly a combined 25 every season ? - nowhere near close to replacing him.

Just look at where we are now to say 3 seasons back

Lloris - much more prone to a mistake
Walker v. Aurier - no contest
Rose v. Davies - no contest
Vertonghen v. Sanchez - no contest
Toby v. Dier or an ageing Toby - no contest
Dembele v. Winks - don't make me laugh
Dier v. Sissoko - well that is 7 out of 7
Eriksen v. LoCelso - Eriksen by a mile, even if LoCelso is one of our better players now.

The Dele/Son/Kane combo back then is more potent than the Kane/Son/whoever combo now.

Teams improve by bringing in better and moving starters to the bench, we have gone the other way, we have removed starters and replaced them with what were bench players.

We are not even close to being where we were, We are not miles better than Leicester or Wolves. Both are better than us.

We had the most amazing run of luck to get to the CL final last year, it was our equivalent of Leicester winning the League.

I agree that some perspective is needed, it is your perspective that needs adjusting, you are totally overrating our team, we are miles away from where we should be, and where you think we are, and will rightfully finish about 7th in the League and have been disappointing in all the cups.
 
Last edited:

Doctor Dinkey

Legacy Fan
Jul 6, 2013
3,627
8,746
If we cant get 5th i would like to skip European football. Just focus on league and cups next year and see where we end up.
I think this would be the right attitude if we were going to be going for the big trophies next year. But realistically we won't be. CL qualification too may be a huge ask and might not happen for another few years. Europa League is our current level, bearing in mind the state of the squad and the likelihood of significantly improving it, and we shouldn't turn our nose up at it.
 

homer hotspur

Well-Known Member
Dec 7, 2014
2,901
4,681
I think this would be the right attitude if we were going to be going for the big trophies next year. But realistically we won't be. CL qualification too may be a huge ask and might not happen for another few years. Europa League is our current level, bearing in mind the state of the squad and the likelihood of significantly improving it, and we shouldn't turn our nose up at it.
And it is far more worthwhile than the league cup. I did read that all euro qualifiers would have to be exempted from it next season so it would be even more underwhelming
 

homer hotspur

Well-Known Member
Dec 7, 2014
2,901
4,681
Lo Celso, who has no goals or assists replaces someone that got roughly a combined 25 every season ? - nowhere near close to replacing him.

Just look at where we are now to say 3 seasons back

Lloris - much more prone to a mistake
Walker v. Aurier - no contest
Rose v. Davies - no contest
Vertonghen v. Sanchez - no contest
Toby v. Dier or an ageing Toby - no contest
Dembele v. Winks - don't make me laugh
Dier v. Sissoko - well that is 7 out of 7
Eriksen v. LoCelso - Eriksen by a mile, even if LoCelso is one of our better players now.

The Dele/Son/Kane combo back then is more potent than the Kane/Son/whoever combo now.

Teams improve by bringing in better and moving starters to the bench, we have gone the other way, we have removed starters and replaced them with what were bench players.

We are not even close to being where we were, We are not miles better than Leicester or Wolves. Both are better than us.

We had the most amazing run of luck to get to the CL final last year, it was our equivalent of Leicester winning the League.

I agree that some perspective is needed, it is your perspective that needs adjusting, you are totally overrating our team, we are miles away from where we should be, and will rightfully finish about 7th in the League and have been disappointing in all the cups.
Yes, I should have made it clear that Wolves and Leicester are clealy better than us with balanced squads and impressive teamwork. If they can keep their players, we will be hard pushed to keep pace with them next season.
 

wrd

Well-Known Member
Aug 22, 2014
13,603
58,005
Don't get the hate for the Europa League, at the very least it gives us an opportunity to watch more Spurs/football matches against different opposition, and the excuses that we should sack it off are poor.

It might not be the competition to be in, but big clubs just get on with it and demonstrate why they are that. Say what you want about them, but all of Utd, Chelsea, Arsenal, and Liverpool in recent years have won or at least come extremely close to winning it. Everything about Spurs - the club, players/manager, fans - though treat the competition as if it's beneath them. And we really are in no position to be acting like that.

I've said before that the Europa League for me is a good test of the overall health of a football club. Take away the gun XI and have you built a solid squad with decent back up options able to come in and perform? How is the youth academy doing, have you got people who can come into these games and show something? etc. You can use it for your benefit and shine a light on whether overall the football club as a whole is doing as good as it thinks it is.

Can see Jose going for it, plus we have the fight to fight for it certainly 2 competitions at least, I'd much rather prioritise Europa over the domestic competitions if we do have to prioritise at all. However I do understand the benefits of having only 3 competitions to deal with over the course of a season rather than 3 but with Jose record in Europe, you'd think the benefits of winning it mean it's worth taking on the extra load.
 

hutchiniho

Top Cat
Mar 19, 2006
4,679
5,935
Why do you think that is? They just suddenly lost all their skill? I don't think so - for me we lost our mojo, our confidence. That's what we had last season that we miss this season. Even with Eriksen for half a season we weren't playing well, so that's not the critical variable. I think Lo Celso adequately replaces him anyway.

Our players are plenty good enough. Sure some upgrades would be nice. But if you compare our team to Wolves, Arsenal, Sheffield, Leicester - we're miles better. I wouldn't trade our squad for Arsenal's in a million years, and that's not because of bias. In terms of quality players we're around the United/Chelsea level (and a bit better than Chelsea before their additions of Werner and Ziyech imo).

Point is to say that we don't belong in the Champions league when we're the current runner ups with mostly the same squad is fairly ridiculous imo. I get that sentiment is negative right now but some perspective is needed.

We definitely don’t belong in the Champions league right now.
We have far too many players all long way from their best
And I don’t think we’re playing with any identity either. There is no fluidity to our forward play at all.
Atm we need GLC playing the 4 and 10.
And this is where I disagree with your Wolves comment.
Again atm, Wolves are a much better ‘team’ than we are.
Every player across the full squad knows the strategy, method, plays their role intelligently and as a result they are perfectly gelled as a team.
I feel we are a bunch of individuals out there.

I do think this is transition as Mourinho tries to mould us in the 1-0 win teams he loves but no way are we a better team than Wolves right now.

we do have quality individuals but they are far from their best and playing with very little team cohesion.

I’d love us to nick 5th but we are where we deserve to be in the table. I’m afraid we’re a solid 7th this year.
 
Last edited:

Bobbins

SC's 14th Sexiest Male 2008
May 5, 2005
21,598
45,146
Why do you think that is? They just suddenly lost all their skill? I don't think so - for me we lost our mojo, our confidence. That's what we had last season that we miss this season. Even with Eriksen for half a season we weren't playing well, so that's not the critical variable. I think Lo Celso adequately replaces him anyway.

Our players are plenty good enough. Sure some upgrades would be nice. But if you compare our team to Wolves, Arsenal, Sheffield, Leicester - we're miles better. I wouldn't trade our squad for Arsenal's in a million years, and that's not because of bias. In terms of quality players we're around the United/Chelsea level (and a bit better than Chelsea before their additions of Werner and Ziyech imo).

Point is to say that we don't belong in the Champions league when we're the current runner ups with mostly the same squad is fairly ridiculous imo. I get that sentiment is negative right now but some perspective is needed.

I know exactly what's happened - what I don't understand is why you think there is any chance of what's gone missing, coming back? There are no signs of that so far. Poch had the team playing beyond their capabilities as individuals into a brilliant collective - and that has gone. That's never coming back. The form some players reached in the past will never return - either due to the former or due to age.

We're not up against Wolves, Arsenal, Sheffield United and Leicester though. We're up against Liverpool, City, United and Chelsea? That's the quality of club we're competing for in the CL spots, and that's the quality of club we'll be up against in the CL itself. We tried that this season and got gang raped by Germans. And you're massively, gigantically underrating Chelsea for some unknown reason. And even if the City ban is upheld, Wolves and Leicester are better teams than us at the moment, IMO.

The fundamental difference between our viewpoints is in the ability of our squad. You think they're fully capable of replicating the form and performances of two/three years ago. I completely disagree and say that due to a change in manager, the aging of players and a fundamental shift in the attitude, objectives and atmosphere of the club and fans, there is absolutely no chance of regaining anything close to that level of performance with the same players.

I'd say that's objectively, demonstrably true and is happening right in front of you right now. You say that's a fairly ridiculous viewpoint. That's where we differ and we're unlikely to get any closer to the middle on this one.

Good discussion though. (y)
 
Last edited:

Bulletspur

The Reasonable Advocate
Match Thread Admin
Oct 17, 2006
10,701
25,259
Don't get the hate for the Europa League, at the very least it gives us an opportunity to watch more Spurs/football matches against different opposition, and the excuses that we should sack it off are poor.

It might not be the competition to be in, but big clubs just get on with it and demonstrate why they are that. Say what you want about them, but all of Utd, Chelsea, Arsenal, and Liverpool in recent years have won or at least come extremely close to winning it. Everything about Spurs - the club, players/manager, fans - though treat the competition as if it's beneath them. And we really are in no position to be acting like that.

I've said before that the Europa League for me is a good test of the overall health of a football club. Take away the gun XI and have you built a solid squad with decent back up options able to come in and perform? How is the youth academy doing, have you got people who can come into these games and show something? etc. You can use it for your benefit and shine a light on whether overall the football club as a whole is doing as good as it thinks it is.
The thing is, quite alot of Spurs supporters are snobs (arrogantly so) when it comes on to what players we should get and what competitions we should be playing in.
 

ItsBoris

Well-Known Member
Jan 18, 2011
7,900
9,301
Lo Celso, who has no goals or assists replaces someone that got roughly a combined 25 every season ? - nowhere near close to replacing him.

Just look at where we are now to say 3 seasons back

Lloris - much more prone to a mistake
Walker v. Aurier - no contest
Rose v. Davies - no contest
Vertonghen v. Sanchez - no contest
Toby v. Dier or an ageing Toby - no contest
Dembele v. Winks - don't make me laugh
Dier v. Sissoko - well that is 7 out of 7
Eriksen v. LoCelso - Eriksen by a mile, even if LoCelso is one of our better players now.

The Dele/Son/Kane combo back then is more potent than the Kane/Son/whoever combo now.

Teams improve by bringing in better and moving starters to the bench, we have gone the other way, we have removed starters and replaced them with what were bench players.

We are not even close to being where we were, We are not miles better than Leicester or Wolves. Both are better than us.

We had the most amazing run of luck to get to the CL final last year, it was our equivalent of Leicester winning the League.

I agree that some perspective is needed, it is your perspective that needs adjusting, you are totally overrating our team, we are miles away from where we should be, and where you think we are, and will rightfully finish about 7th in the League and have been disappointing in all the cups.

I'm talking about specifically last season. I would agree that we've regressed a bit since 2017 when we were the 2nd best team in the league, which I would put down to losing Walker and Dembele mainly.

Minus Rose and Trippier, we can put out the same team that started the CL final last year (presumably what Poch thought was our best team at the time). And most people were not concerned about either of those players leaving (the other options about as good as those two).

I don't see why you would think that the Dele/Son/Kane combo couldn't be good again. Again, I think it's just that the team became complacent and lost confidence. The only other explanation is that those players have lost individual skill, but I think that's unlikely given all three are relatively young still.
 

Trotter

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2009
2,169
3,312
I'm talking about specifically last season. I would agree that we've regressed a bit since 2017 when we were the 2nd best team in the league, which I would put down to losing Walker and Dembele mainly.

Minus Rose and Trippier, we can put out the same team that started the CL final last year (presumably what Poch thought was our best team at the time). And most people were not concerned about either of those players leaving (the other options about as good as those two).

I don't see why you would think that the Dele/Son/Kane combo couldn't be good again. Again, I think it's just that the team became complacent and lost confidence. The only other explanation is that those players have lost individual skill, but I think that's unlikely given all three are relatively young still.

Regressed a bit since 2017, you are the master of the understatement.

Are you forgetting we have also lost arguably our best footballer and arguably our best playmaker since Hoddle from that team.
Also Jan and Toby have another year in their legs, and have basically had to be replaced. So that means we are basically unable to play any of the back 4 that started the CL final or our playmaker.

6 of our back 7 (Aurier, Sanchez, Winks, Sissoko, Davies, second CB) are not of the required level to challenge, they still are what they were 2 years ago, bench warmer standard, but we have brought into team to replace what were much better players than them, and Lloris whilst still decent is regressing.
The only player outside of our forward line that would even have a chance of a start for any of Chelsea, Man U, Man C or Liverpool is LoCelso.
That is why we are not good enough.
Our front line is still reasonably deadly, although are relying on counter attacking, rather than having them created for them now Eriksen has gone.

A few years ago it was hard to find players that we could afford to improve our first team, now we could easily do that, and from a lot of other teams in the League because the level of our players is significantly less than it was then.
 
Last edited:

ItsBoris

Well-Known Member
Jan 18, 2011
7,900
9,301
I know exactly what's happened - what I don't understand is why you think there is any chance of what's gone missing, coming back? There are no signs of that so far. Poch had the team playing beyond their capabilities as individuals into a brilliant collective - and that has gone. That's never coming back. The form some players reached in the past will never return - either due to the former or due to age.

We're not up against Wolves, Arsenal, Sheffield United and Leicester though. We're up against Liverpool, City, United and Chelsea? That's the quality of club we're competing for in the CL spots, and that's the quality of club we'll be up against in the CL itself. We tried that this season and got gang raped by Germans. And you're massively, gigantically underrating Chelsea for some unknown reason. And even if the City ban is upheld, Wolves and Leicester are better teams than us at the moment, IMO.

The fundamental difference between our viewpoints is in the ability of our squad. You think they're fully capable of replicating the form and performances of two/three years ago. I completely disagree and say that due to a change in manager, the aging of players and a fundamental shift in the attitude, objectives and atmosphere of the club and fans, there is absolutely no chance of regaining anything close to that level of performance with the same players.

I'd say that's objectively, demonstrably true and is happening right in front of you right now. You say that's a fairly ridiculous viewpoint. That's where we differ and we're unlikely to get any closer to the middle on this one.

Good discussion though. (y)

It's not even that - it's quite simple really. The original discussion started over the question whether we "deserved" or "belonged" in the Champions league. I think when largely the same team reached the final last year, and we have a manager who's won it multiple times, we can absolutely feel as though we deserve to be there. We definitely have more pedigree as a club right now than any other club competing for the top 4 bar Chelsea perhaps. As a random example, if Barcelona were to draw Wolves in the CL group stage, they would be giddy with excitement and probably score double digit goals over the two games. If they drew us in the CL group stage they would actually consider it a challenge. Wolves, Sheffield, or Arsenal in their current state would be an embarrassment to the premier league if they made CL spots.

I'm not saying we're as good as we were (obviously not even close on form), but at the same time I think the same level or higher is totally achievable. If you seriously think that Leicester or Wolves are better than we are, then you'd have to be willing to swap our squad for their's. I guarantee you Jose would not make that swap. I don't think 95% of this forum would either. I wouldn't even swap our team with Chelsea's of this season, although I think their additions this summer are really good.

Let me phrase it this way and perhaps we can find some agreement: how would you rank the teams competing for the top 4 in their potential to reach the later stages of the Champions league next season? I would rank it as Chelsea, United, Spurs, Leicester, Arsenal, Wolves, Sheffield. And I would say that we have similar potential to Chelsea and United (could have interchanged those places).
 

ItsBoris

Well-Known Member
Jan 18, 2011
7,900
9,301
Regressed a bit since 2017, you are the master of the understatement.

Are you forgetting we have also lost arguably our best footballer and arguably our best playmaker since Hoddle from that team.
Also Jan and Toby have another year in their legs, and have basically had to be replaced. So that means we are basically unable to play any of the back 4 that started the CL final or our playmaker.

6 of our back 7 (Aurier, Sanchez, Winks, Sissoko, Davies, second CB) are not of the required level to challenge, they still are what they were 2 years ago, bench warmer standard, but we have brought into team to replace what were much better players than them, and Lloris whilst still decent is regressing.
The only player outside of our forward line that would even have a chance of a start for any of Chelsea, Man U, Man C or Liverpool is LoCelso.
That is why we are not good enough.
Our front line is still reasonably deadly, although are relying on counter attacking, rather than having them created for them now Eriksen has gone.

Nah I think our CB pairing and goalkeeper would start for Chelsea. And these sort of discussions are so dependent on players' form that they're difficult to have objectively. Last season the only Man United player that would get in our team was Paul Pogba. This season it's different because they're in better form and we're in worse form.

I agree that we aren't good enough yet, but like I said we're much more likely to progress further in the Champions league than Wolves, Leicester, Arsenal, or Sheffield. So I'm just taking exception with the idea that we don't deserve to be or belong in the CL (can't remember the original phrasing of the point).

I should point out that if City aren't banned then yeah I think it's pretty unlikely that we'll make it. I do however think we have a decent chance of making 5th place. There's no reason to give up on that yet.
 

Trotter

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2009
2,169
3,312
Nah I think our CB pairing and goalkeeper would start for Chelsea. And these sort of discussions are so dependent on players' form that they're difficult to have objectively. Last season the only Man United player that would get in our team was Paul Pogba. This season it's different because they're in better form and we're in worse form.

I agree that we aren't good enough yet, but like I said we're much more likely to progress further in the Champions league than Wolves, Leicester, Arsenal, or Sheffield. So I'm just taking exception with the idea that we don't deserve to be or belong in the CL (can't remember the original phrasing of the point).

I should point out that if City aren't banned then yeah I think it's pretty unlikely that we'll make it. I do however think we have a decent chance of making 5th place. There's no reason to give up on that yet.

What do you regard as our CB pairing ?
Because I don't think any of Sanchez, Tanganga, Vertonghen as he is now he has aged, Toby as he is now he has aged or Foyth gets in above any of theirs. Before the game in the week we had kept the least clean sheets of any team in League (4), at least now we have gone above Norwich in that stat. We have had to move a 3rd or 4th choice central midfielder there in last few games because the others don't cut the mustard.

And it isn't just a case of form, it is standard of players. We have basically replaced our whole back 4, and have replaced them with weaker players, in effect the prior seasons substitutes.

And I disagree, I think Leicester or Wolves would both be more likely to progress in CL than us with the current squads we all have, simply because they are better teams than us. They don't have the glaring weakness that we do. Leicester have scored 9 (the 3rd most in league) and conceded 12 less (the 2nd least in league) than us this season, do you somehow think that is a fluke ?
 
Last edited:
Top