What's new

Premier League 2020/21

C0YS

Just another member
Jul 9, 2007
12,780
13,817
Shame about the end, typical of Lampard's Chelsea really. A lot going forwards but still very brittle. Still happy they dropped points.
 

Shadydan

Well-Known Member
Jul 7, 2012
38,247
104,143
Taken 2 points off them, we'd been happy with that before the match.

Chelsea and Utd both look utter shite, both performances papering over cracks.
 

JCRD

Well-Known Member
Aug 10, 2018
19,153
30,013
It wasn't a handball. It came off his chest onto his arm. Purely accidental. The ruling changed I think now.
 

dondo

Well-Known Member
Jan 4, 2006
8,603
14,091
Lol how the ever living fuck is that not a handball yet United's pen was. Come on. At this rate we'll need an inquiry into this shit.

I thought VAR would even the decisions out between the big clubs and the smaller clubs, it’s just made it more obvious that there is blatant biased
 

bradfordspur

Well-Known Member
Dec 6, 2006
1,280
1,683
I think that was a league match though. I may be wrong..

Painful memories!

Sep 29, 2001 Tottenham Hotspur 3-5 Manchester United

Richards (15'), Ziege (45'), Ferdinand (25')
FT(HT: 3-0)
Blanc (58'), Beckham (87'), Sebastian Veron (76'), van Nistelrooy (72'), Cole (46')

4 February 2004 FA Cup 4th Round
Tottenham Hotspur3–4Manchester City
  • King
    Goal
    2'
  • Keane
    Goal
    19'
  • Ziege
    Goal
    43'
Report

Joey Barton was sent off at half time!
 

Wizzy77

Well-Known Member
Sep 1, 2019
1,023
4,347
Did a little digging. The last team to lose after leading by 3 goals is not us in 2001.

Its Wolves 4 Leicester 3 in 2003.
 

JCRD

Well-Known Member
Aug 10, 2018
19,153
30,013
Painful memories!

Sep 29, 2001 Tottenham Hotspur 3-5 Manchester United

Richards (15'), Ziege (45'), Ferdinand (25')
FT(HT: 3-0)
Blanc (58'), Beckham (87'), Sebastian Veron (76'), van Nistelrooy (72'), Cole (46')

4 February 2004 FA Cup 4th Round

Joey Barton was sent off at half time!


I was at that Shitty game - i didnt even know Man Shitty were a man down until I was driving back home
 

Wizzy77

Well-Known Member
Sep 1, 2019
1,023
4,347
I remembered i was jumping around in joy... couldnt believe a 3 0 lead against United. We are then the 3 points team to them. .

At full time... such was the disbelief...argh painful memories..
 

Wadec

Well-Known Member
May 14, 2014
1,800
5,535
Same as the United result. Not concerned about Chelsea getting a point.

They are way off the pace, poor at the back and have a manager not ready for the job he is in.

Would be quite happy for Utd and Chavs to tick along for now scraping results, they aren't good enough and will eventually change managers. When they do they will be much more of a threat.
 

C0YS

Just another member
Jul 9, 2007
12,780
13,817
It wasn't a handball. It came off his chest onto his arm. Purely accidental. The ruling changed I think now.
No it hasn't changed. Still applies if arm is in unnatural position, well if it were to be consistent with the norms.

There is also the question of if the goal was seen to come directly from the usage of the arm. Where handling regardless of intent will always disallow the goal, I tend to think in this case the rule doesn't apply as it wasn't the pass or shot directly leading to a goal. I do wonder if it was, say against Man utd, if the ruling would have been the same however.
 

Duck

Active Member
Aug 8, 2019
121
81
It wasn't a handball. It came off his chest onto his arm. Purely accidental. The ruling changed I think now.
Please. There's no consistency in these rulings whatsoever.

One rule for the big teams, another for the small teams. The FA can't afford to let the big teams drop too much.
 

ardiles

Well-Known Member
Nov 24, 2006
13,228
40,308
That equaliser may have given Frank a stay of execution, so it isn’t all that bad. Chelsea still dropped two points against lowly opponents.
 

C0YS

Just another member
Jul 9, 2007
12,780
13,817
Same as the United result. Not concerned about Chelsea getting a point.

They are way off the pace, poor at the back and have a manager not ready for the job he is in.

Would be quite happy for Utd and Chavs to tick along for now scraping results, they aren't good enough and will eventually change managers. When they do they will be much more of a threat.
I don't think either team will be particularly consistent. But, I also am not convinced we will be particularly better. Changing managers might help, but the reality is both squads are still very imbalanced and there is a deeper problem there. In Chelsea it's because they are in a transitional period, in Man Utd it's a lack of clear strategy from above, and it's been a problem ever since Ferguson left.
 

JCRD

Well-Known Member
Aug 10, 2018
19,153
30,013
No it hasn't changed. Still applies if arm is in unnatural position, well if it were to be consistent with the norms.

There is also the question of if the goal was seen to come directly from the usage of the arm. Where handling regardless of intent will always disallow the goal, I tend to think in this case the rule doesn't apply as it wasn't the pass or shot directly leading to a goal. I do wonder if it was, say against Man utd, if the ruling would have been the same however.

OK my bad, I still don't think it was handball. It was clearly in a natural position. Maupay today was clearly not in an unnatural position.

I don't think there is bias in all honesty. Perhaps if there are fans then you can be swayed slightly at first but think that decision for chelscum was fine.

Palace today however... Not for me.
 

tony0379

The bald midget has to go!
May 17, 2004
15,925
41,677
Painful memories!

Sep 29, 2001 Tottenham Hotspur 3-5 Manchester United

Richards (15'), Ziege (45'), Ferdinand (25')
FT(HT: 3-0)
Blanc (58'), Beckham (87'), Sebastian Veron (76'), van Nistelrooy (72'), Cole (46')

4 February 2004 FA Cup 4th Round

Joey Barton was sent off at half time!
I was watching it in a pub in Cyprus and the electricity went off at 3-2, got home and checked ceefax. Couldn't believe it
 

C0YS

Just another member
Jul 9, 2007
12,780
13,817
OK my bad, I still don't think it was handball. It was clearly in a natural position. Maupay today was clearly not in an unnatural position.

I don't think there is bias in all honesty. Perhaps if there are fans then you can be swayed slightly at first but think that decision for chelscum was fine.

Palace today however... Not for me.
I haven't seen the replay, but for clarity, natural position is hands close to your chest, that's it. In theory there is minimal interpretation in these rules.

This was created to give clarity to VAR regarding hand balls (which is why I hate the argument that 'the problem isn't VAR it's the handball rule' as if they were not inherently linked). Right now people are trying to take subjectivity out of the game and to be easier managed by VAR. Not only are they failing at that, but the game is and always will be inherently subjective, and that's why people continuously argue about these decisions all the time. The most important thing is consistency, strong consistency within the match itself and a looser consistency amongst all referees. It's okay for refs to have their own style, it makes the game interesting a varied, VAR is trying to make football more objective and this is not for the benefit of the game but as an attempt to protect referees.
 
Top