- Jul 7, 2016
- 1,918
- 5,046
what do you mean? Like a loan from the government that each worker had to pay back? Surely not.
Not the workers the companies, that’s how Liverpool’s statement read.
what do you mean? Like a loan from the government that each worker had to pay back? Surely not.
PR disaster tbh. You can’t furlough staff, whilst continuing to pay players and directors millions. Absolute joke decision.
Simon Jordan said earlier that the main reason we are doing it is to put pressure on the players to free up cash to help the non-playing staff.
Not sure i buy that but that was his argument
Daniel Levy pretty much insinuated that in his comments.
Player's don't want to help the playing staff seeing as the owner is worth over £6B, he really ought to put his hand in his pocket tbh.
8x the outrage, it never hurts.Are the same people now having the same argument on the same subject in 8 different threads now?
Are the same people now having the same argument on the same subject in 8 different threads now?
But with FFP can he just pay the wages? I would see that as money being pumped into the club and needs to come from income within the club.
They should just tell everyone at the club is getting a 20% decrease in wages to make it fair, but I know it's harder with players and not a proper PAYE contract.
Fuck, I'm only in 6 of them, where are the other 2 so I can participate!
Probably overlapping in the ENIC thread and PL season being suspended I guess? Can't see anywhere else.
Not sure £2-3m would put us in danger of breaking any FFP rules tbh
Opposition fans, Corona, Have you missed football, Red Dead Redemption 2, Cookery and probably Username changes
But I thought they couldn't just put money into the club? And that's why city have been done, as they were doing it via paying sponsors to the pay more to them than agreed?
I might be wrong as trying to find something about this just now to say one way or the other.
Eventually I'll find someone who agrees with me.Are the same people now having the same argument on the same subject in 8 different threads now?
Sorted.Eventually I'll find someone who agrees with me.
I'm furloughed as of 5pm Thursday, but I said I would only accept it if we could call it something else as the word has, easily, jumped into third spot of "worst words in the English language" imo.
I hit the thesaurus and found "Fired" and "Freed" as the top two options, neither of which seemed like they would go down well in a meeting, so I settled with using a similar but different word each time I refer to it. Glancing back at my inbox this week, so far it's been; formula, furrowed, flowered, fluoride and fancypantsed - nobody has corrected me, even once.