- Jan 28, 2011
- 14,099
- 18,455
That is lovely
This one is doing the rounds on Twitter tonight. Got to say, I like the simplistic design
View attachment 50352
Dislexcist bastardSPUPS? Someone get the nike factory kids to learn how to spell first before getting behind a sewing machine please.
Dislexcist bastard
my thoughts exactly. Clearly a fake. Whether its based on a real design or not is another matter, but thats defo not the real dealSo, nobody is going to mention the AIA logo being at an angle? I'm getting a fake vibe
I'd be happy with that, but not convinced (clearly it's a fake knock off, but that doesnt mean its not a knock off of the genuine design)... I don't know why, just not convinced... We'll see soon enough though
I wasn't moaning about it...I was pointing out the fallacy of your argument/reasoning. You can have a classic look with a totally new design. The Bale HP billboard kit was totally different to last year yet they were both sort of classic looking.Every year we all have the exact same conversation.
Nike have agreed to pay us a feckin shit ton of money to be our kit maker.
This is possible due to income Nike will generate when selling them.
If they just made a plain white shirt and plain blue shirt every year, then by the end of year 2, at best, sales will stop.
It's a business. If you want Spurs to compete, you just need to accept that:
Kits needs to be changed every year.
Sponsors gon' be red.
Stadium gonna get a name
It's of no use moaning about it. You're totally free to not buy a replica kit if you don't like it. There's plenty of conservative apparel you can buy to show your loyalty (and, if it's not Nike, will give far more to the club)
Think that’s going to be on the 3rd kitI thought all Nike kits next season were to feature the Nike Sportswear logo (ie the tick with the word Nike above it)? Or was that just a rumour?
Think the ones with that logo are the third kits mate. Would fit more in line with what we’ve heard of a dark people away kit.
I quite liked the 'sash' top, as well as this year's top; thought they both looked quality.
But for me, the best kit in recent years is the 2013/14 one with HP as sponsor;
http://www.historicalkits.co.uk/Tottenham_Hotspur/Tottenham_Hotspur.htm
Classy!
They are probably happy to shift all the remaining shirts from this season.Imagine if the club got the new kit out now. How many would we sell in the lead up to the Madrid!? We always miss the opportunity to sell shirts though, so not likely.
They are probably happy to shift all the remaining shirts from this season.
Then once we become European champions they’ll bring the new ones out and shift even more
They are probably happy to shift all the remaining shirts from this season.
Then once we become European champions they’ll bring the new ones out and shift even more
I like the awaye & 3rd kit tbhThey’ll be waiting an age to shift this season’s shite shirt; they’re practically giving them away on the web (20 quid gets you a brand new one, with tags). Saddest part is that this year ALL THREE are bloody awful. Usually at least one version is cool; not this time, however. Literally the 3 ugliest kits we’ve ever had by far.
Makes the Mansion days seem almost palatable by comparison.
Not entirely accurate. That's true for the likes of Chelsea and City, but one of the reasons our arrangement with Nike is less lucrative financially in terms of the reported annual lump sum payment is that we have retained a greater share of the income derived from merchandise sales than other clubs do. This information is in the public domain and came directly from Levy.don't forget with a gold star, if they do it now and we win we will have an extra shirt.
to do that all that would happen is we would be making Nike richer as they have already paid us. think the only extra money we make is having a name printed on the back, or do we still receive a small %?