- Aug 25, 2010
- 55,377
- 100,890
You keep saying the intention was correct, when it wasn't. It would only have been correct if some circumstances had contrived for a shot to be hit in that corner and him being in place when that happened. Neither of which happened or were very likely.
We are splitting hairs about the goal that cost us 2 points, that according to you our excellent game plan and superior chances had earned.
I hope he learns, because I think his instincts were wrong. And I don't think he's alone either, I think several times this season or defenders, particularly Dier and Kaboul have made some poor instinctive decisions under pressure that have cost us.
It was. Again how do you know were Welbeck would of placed his shot. Everybody expected Welbeck to connect with the ball, you can't fault him for that.
I am actually amazed by your stubbornness, its reaching new heights.
You can't fault a player for reacting like that, it looked an absolute cert that Welbeck was going to get a shot off. He's took a chance at getting back to cover that free side of the goal. Its a split second decision. If Welbeck connects like he should do he scores or just maybe Rose gets a mad deflection/block on it which saves a goal.
What is so hard to understand about that.