To me he provides a great alternative to Hulk with costs considered.
willian is 24, playing in a weaker league, will cost more, and has much less impressive stats than remyAm I the only one here who is not getting excited ? He is 25 YO and only in his last 2 seasons he have started to blossom, looks to me as a big gamble if he costs more than 12 mil.
Better sign William and wait for January for a better option.
Am I the only one here who is not getting excited ? He is 25 YO and only in his last 2 seasons he have started to blossom, looks to me as a big gamble if he costs more than 12 mil.
Better sign William and wait for January for a better option.
can somebody refresh my memory re Remy - weren't we interested in him a few years back, then his club (Nice I think) agreed a fee with Stoke only for him to fail a medical, or did he turn them down?
I'm far from convinced about Remy tbh, especially given his injury record. If we're looking at him for the RWF position then I'd personally have preferred Willian, who I think has exactly the sort of guile, unpredictability and technique that we need.
On the plus side though, if the plan is to switch to a 433 then we're going to need the wing forwards to weigh in with a fair load of goals, and Remy would be more conducive towards that. Also, of course, it provides that much needed cover for Ade up front. I do have concerns about Remy but I suppose it all comes down to price really.
why not?I really hope this one isn't true. I've been reasonably happy with our incomings so far.
But surely this is why Remy is the better option out of him and Willian? Essentially 2 players in 1.