Boris says 'Premiership' a lot. And some other very interesting stuff.
Read the full article at TheTottenhamWay
Read the full article at TheTottenhamWay
I assume that it's due to the fact that all this is hypothetical until the dispute with Archway is settled.My question is: Why haven't Spurs even applied to rent the O.S.? (as Boris implied in the article).
Thanks.I assume that it's due to the fact that all this is hypothetical until the dispute with Archway is settled.
It's not about fairness; it is about what someone can get away with. Apparently, the Spammers can get away with a lot. Shame on the authorities (whoever they are) for allowing things to get this way without regards to the public purse.How on earth can the pikeys refuse to pay anything towards the stadium and expect the public to pick up the cost of a new roof that only benefits them?
And how on earth if they aren't contributing anything financially can they be given a say as to whether we can use it?
Surely Boris must have looked at it and realised how much money the area would lose on a match day if we were to move out of London?
So in short, they are not contributing to the cost of a new roof and they are dictating who can use it....do they not realise they are only tenants or is that above the IQ of the dildo family?
If you look carefully there is a real under current of pro WHAM in the media and politics."ginola007, post: 4293634, member: 23516"]It's not about fairness; it is about what someone can get away with. Apparently, the Spammers can get away with a lot. Shame on the authorities (whoever they are) for allowing things to get this way without regards to the public purse.