thinktank
Hmmm...
- Sep 28, 2004
- 45,893
- 68,893
Probably being saved for shniehead's end of season finale.
The Daily ITK Discussion Thread - 13th August 2014
- Thread starter Archibald&Crooks
- Start date
- Status
SteveH
BSoDL candidate for SW London
- Jul 21, 2003
- 8,642
- 9,313
TEESSIDE1
Married, new job and Spurs on the up!
- Jul 3, 2006
- 15,216
- 19,010
Ring-ding-ding-ding-dingeringeding!
Gering-ding-ding-ding-dingeringeding!
Gering-ding-ding-ding-dingeringeding!
What the fox say?
Wa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pow!
Wa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pow!
Wa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pow!
What the fox say?
Hatee-hatee-hatee-ho!
Hatee-hatee-hatee-ho!
Hatee-hatee-hatee-ho!
What the fox say?
Joff-tchoff-tchoffo-tchoffo-tchoff!
Tchoff-tchoff-tchoffo-tchoffo-tchoff!
Joff-tchoff-tchoffo-tchoffo-tchoff!
dondo
Well-Known Member
- Jan 4, 2006
- 8,603
- 14,091
THFCSPURS19
The Speaker of the Transfer Rumours Forum
- Jan 6, 2013
- 37,894
- 130,529
I don't know if anyone's posted this but Pochettino has said this (and it's on the OS!!!). If if something like this is on the OS, you know they want to make something clear (like the Lloris to Arsenal bullshit):
http://www.tottenhamhotspur.com/news/west-ham-v-spurs-mauricio-preview-140814/
http://www.tottenhamhotspur.com/news/west-ham-v-spurs-mauricio-preview-140814/
Teddy Klinsmann
Well-Known Member
- Aug 5, 2008
- 7,355
- 18,331
Was there any ITK on Kane or Rose new deals? Plenty of ITK on Vertonghen's potential new contract...just hope it happens.
Mr Pink
SC Supporter
- Aug 25, 2010
- 55,215
- 100,495
Unhelpful because it weakens our bargaining position!!!
Everlasting Seconds
Well-Known Member
- Jan 9, 2014
- 14,914
- 26,616
How? "We have a good squad, there is no need to move players, all is under control" can not weaken anything, can it?
TEESSIDE1
Married, new job and Spurs on the up!
- Jul 3, 2006
- 15,216
- 19,010
Already done by WPD with a shiney video
Another user to add to my SC members to bump off list
Just spin from Poch
We have a bigger squad than we have squad numbers, think someone the other day said our first team squad is 32 and we can only choose 25
No logic in paying 7 players north of 50k a week to sit in the stands, we will shift some surely
We have a bigger squad than we have squad numbers, think someone the other day said our first team squad is 32 and we can only choose 25
No logic in paying 7 players north of 50k a week to sit in the stands, we will shift some surely
St José Dominguez
Well-Known Member
- Jul 15, 2014
- 3,592
- 11,648
Confirms my thinking, if you look at squad and minus off all the loans you'd expect we're pretty much at the 25. So it would be one in one out if any of these transfers occur.
Everlasting Seconds
Well-Known Member
- Jan 9, 2014
- 14,914
- 26,616
This again, OK.
Pochettino earlier stated that he prefer to work with a pool of 25 players. That's a preference, not a "must".
We must register players above a certain age. That's an obligation, not a preference.
Presently, we have 26 players above that age.
Players who are under that age, can play at will without being registered among those 25. That's a fact.
Thus, Pochettino's preferences might suggest that a few players can be sold, but official rules and regulations allow us to use the entire squad this season save 1 player, who obviously must be sold or loaned out. That's reason.
I highly doubt that those youngsters who make up the difference between 26 and 32 players are on 50K a week. But that's just opinion.
Mr Pink
SC Supporter
- Aug 25, 2010
- 55,215
- 100,495
I was quoting the unhelpful bit not saying his remarks are unhelpful.
lol...I mean that's why they've felt the need to address it! Which is good!
THFCSPURS19
The Speaker of the Transfer Rumours Forum
- Jan 6, 2013
- 37,894
- 130,529
What KO?45 hours until KO
spursfan77
Well-Known Member
- Aug 13, 2005
- 46,687
- 104,969
I said the other day it was just that journalist trying to upset us.
Mr Pink
SC Supporter
- Aug 25, 2010
- 55,215
- 100,495
West Ham...first game of the season.
- Status
