What's new

The Cricket Thread

mpickard2087

Patient Zero
Jun 13, 2008
21,889
32,562
Good win to kick things off. South Africa did help us with that collapse in the middle of the innings when they looked pretty well set, but that was a really good bowling/fielding effort to defend the total with ease and all in all a very decent start.
 

fatpiranha

dismember
Jun 9, 2003
8,337
21,678
Catch of the century ,???


It's a pretty good one isn't it? A lot of the other contender feature the fielder initially going the wrong way and changing direction, in other words, they made an easy catch into a hard one by their own mistakes and then pulled off a worldy. Stokes (by his own admission) was out of position when the ball was delivered but did nothing wrong during the play, so to my mind that makes it a truly great catch.
 

dondo

Well-Known Member
Jan 4, 2006
8,603
14,091
The matches so far have not really excited too much yet all the matches have been very one sided
 

SE Spurs

Well-Known Member
Aug 12, 2018
2,705
4,821
Any chance of a competitive game of cricket at this WC.

SA v Bangladesh today. Could've done with SA losing the toss. Fear another first innings not making the 50 overs.
 

Spurslove

Well-Known Member
Jul 6, 2012
6,627
9,281
Genuine question, and I hope someone out there can help me...

I'm an avid cricket fan (and a member of Surrey CCC at The Oval). Right now we've got the World Cup going on and I must say, I'm thoroughly enjoying it, and the on screen graphics showing us what's happening have been greatly improved. Gone are the ridiculous tenths of a mile per hour for every ball bowled (83.8 or 90.3 etc) now, we just get the rounded up figure, which is great.

But my question is about the number of runs shown as being scored during each over. Why, when a wide has been bowled and a run has been added to the score, does the on-screen graphic show a 0 over the 'WD' ?

Anhyone have any idea? It's weird.

.
 

LSUY

Well-Known Member
Jul 12, 2005
24,027
66,879
Genuine question, and I hope someone out there can help me...

I'm an avid cricket fan (and a member of Surrey CCC at The Oval). Right now we've got the World Cup going on and I must say, I'm thoroughly enjoying it, and the on screen graphics showing us what's happening have been greatly improved. Gone are the ridiculous tenths of a mile per hour for every ball bowled (83.8 or 90.3 etc) now, we just get the rounded up figure, which is great.

But my question is about the number of runs shown as being scored during each over. Why, when a wide has been bowled and a run has been added to the score, does the on-screen graphic show a 0 over the 'WD' ?

Anhyone have any idea? It's weird.

.

I think the 0 is to show that the batsman hasn't run byes or hit the ball to the boundary.
 
Top