what's a Rocha?
ferrero
Did you read the rest of my post??? Not just POINT NUMBER 1????And that is why I put no creadance in Paul's posts. Thank you SS57; if I can't rep you now I will ASAP.
:clap:
SS57, it might be something as simple as they feel he is too short to be a CB. This isn't unlikely since we have a poor defensive record especially from set pieces :shrug:
ss57 was right in that 2 very different coaches haven't rated him. Short? on talent, I'm afraid. Remember how much he cost. Not a lot. Squad player, nothing more I'm afraid lads...
I defintely agree behind a fit Woody and King, but the topic is should he be ahead of Dawson. I think he should.
Did you read the rest of my post??? Not just POINT NUMBER 1????
Maybe you will have seen its was slightly lighthearted.........or maybe not as you were prob stuck so far up ss57's arse. :shake: oooo rep me rep me
You put no creadance in my post's?
Sobbing my heart out about that i am. Sobbing
You may say your reply was light hearted, I personally didn't find it that funny, I just think you couldn't come up an actual reason why you didn't rate Rocha. Instead you just listed some stupid things that came to you head.
However your first point was serious as for you to say he's too small in a light hearted way would indicate that Rocha is taller than average for someone to be considered tall otherwise the humour doesn't work. He's not though, 6ft is an average height and therefor he's just an average height, where's the humour in calling him too small?
Paul, no offence mate, but I liken your comments to that of a 12 year old, or a retard.
take your pick.
Too small for a CB in my opinion. That ok with you? Sorry if you did nt find any of it funny but go tell someone who gives a shit
And Kendall, no offence mate but PMT? or just a nob head?
Now sshhhh
Chris, you may agree all you want, but whilst it's possible that one coach might have an inexplicable blind spot about a player, when two coaches appear to agree on him there's a high probability that they've got it right and we've got it wrong.