- Jul 15, 2014
- 38
- 147
Loan with obligation to buy. To help betis get the better deal since PSG put sell on clause on himQuestion; why are we only going for a loan? Is it to cover for the crazy amount we're buying Dybala for?
Loan with obligation to buy. To help betis get the better deal since PSG put sell on clause on himQuestion; why are we only going for a loan? Is it to cover for the crazy amount we're buying Dybala for?
I think it helps Betis get more money out of the transfer because of a sell on clause with PSG.Question; why are we only going for a loan? Is it to cover for the crazy amount we're buying Dybala for?
This is bloody smart.
Less sell on for Betis to get the deal done.
Less money up front for us, allowing us to do both GLC/Dybala deals with no immediate reliance on Eriksen cash.
Bloody brilliance.
No one stalk the training ground?
The initial loan deal for Lo Celso certainly makes me more confident that we could finance a move for Dybala. Very smart if that's what we've been intending all along.
Why did ypu have to say that?PSG have been done up a kipper, lets hope they dont buy dybala just to spite us haha
Think of it more like deferring payment than a simple loanQuestion; why are we only going for a loan? Is it to cover for the crazy amount we're buying Dybala for?
The initial loan deal for Lo Celso certainly makes me more confident that we could finance a move for Dybala. Very smart if that's what we've been intending all along.
Unless I've missed something, the sell-on clause was between PSG and Betis and the way we've done the deal allows Betis to minimise what they have to fork over for that.A 20% sell on clause sounds huge if we've agreed to it :\
No complaints though
Yep. It's why they have been so reluctant to sell for less than 70m because anything lower and they don't make a substantial profitUnless I've missed something, the sell-on clause was between PSG and Betis and the way we've done the deal allows Betis to minimise what they have to fork over for that.
And then they were introduced to Daniel Levy Esq.Yep. It's why they have been so reluctant to sell for less than 70m because anything lower and they don't make a substantial profit