- May 7, 2004
- 42,535
- 78,151
I doubt we would have bid on Lo Celso if that were the case. I'm sure we have the money without the need to sell Eriksen. Otherwise we would only bid on him if we were sure Eriksen was leaving.My belief was it was going to be Ndombele and Lo Celso effectively replacing Dembele and Eriksen, that’s why we went so clearly after both.
I think the fact Eriksen is now looking like staying is what’s out the brakes on things. We can’t justify that sort of outlay without recouping some somewhere.
The most logical thing for me would be to shift Lamela and then bring Lo Celso in, as I’m not sure Lamela has the dynamism and goal threat to mix it with Son, Alli, Moura etc in that attacking bank of players, equally he’s not really a CM in the way Eriksen can sit deeper. Throw in the stories yesterday about Bale or Zaha, who’d be a better fit than Lamela.
But the ITK suggests Lamela is wanted by Poch.
Dier, Sissoko, Wanyama
Ndombele, Eriksen, Lo Celso, Winks
Bale/Zaha, Moura, Alli, Son, Kane
Can we juggle that many?
Maybe with Eriksen staying Elimas may be a project alternative to Lo Celso with the extra funds going to Bale/Zaha instead.
We made no signings last summer, we're playing regular Champions League football and now the stadium is built we have a massive money generator. I could certainly see us putting the money together for another big money signing.
I'm sure the delay is more to do with getting other deals done. This one can wait because he's away with Argentina anyway so it will have to wait regardless. The Ndombele deal picked up after his international games and holiday. No need to rush this one just yet and it also gives Betis time to bring players in first in the meantime.