The NFL's most recent 'big' announcement (a sponsorship deal with Hyundai a couple of weeks ago) was released at 3pm UK time (7am Pacific, 10am Eastern). Might be a reasonable guide as to when we might expect to hear anything.
how anyone is expected to work today as we await this news is beyond me
The Goat has said there would be a 'sting in the tail' regarding the stadium announcement. Could this be MK dons being announced, after all that has been said this last week regarding Wembley?
How will we react if the announcement is simply that two or three games a year will be played at the new stadium? Will we be happy, content, or disappointed?
I ask because we do seem always to be setting ourselves up for a fall, getting our hopes up to levels that means reality regularly feels like shit. I'm finding it hard to believe that this will be a world-changing announcement. A little bit of reasonably good news would be nice, but I fear it may be desperately disappointing for some.
The Goat has said there would be a 'sting in the tail' regarding the stadium announcement. Could this be MK dons being announced, after all that has been said this last week regarding Wembley?
Sting....hornets
We are not going to MK we are going to Watford!?
Has to be a ground share with Watford right?
I'm expecting the sting to be 2 years away due to the complexity of the works on elements such as the sliding pitch. I am also expecting it to be MK. I don't think MK alone will be considered 'a sting' as we're all already half expecting it.The Goat has said there would be a 'sting in the tail' regarding the stadium announcement. Could this be MK dons being announced, after all that has been said this last week regarding Wembley?
No retractable pitch would be a blow, but the Wembley pitch problems weren't really about the NFL. The original pitch just wasn't fit for purpose.I think that may be in relation to the ITK's comment about 'the pitch being fine'. Despite all of the speculation, we may not end up having a retractable pitch and have to share the playing surface with the NFL. That really would be a 'sting in the tail' looking at what a debacle Wembley was.
I dunno, I think that is a bit of a leap, don't know what Chelsea would have to gain that would make it worth their while funding Archway. I met the owner of Valentinos before he sold it and his attitude was that he wanted to get as much as he could from Spurs and that was his retirement, I suspect that the Archway lot had a similar outlook, just took it too far.We'll end up sharing with the goons, i'm still of the onion that this NFL stuff is/was a bargaining chip to hit the FA with so we could get Wembley on the cheap in exchange we don't nick all the NFL games from their pockets.
Also am i the only the one who believes the Chavs timing RE: Wembley is fairly "convenient" the sort of "convenient" that points towards them having been funding Archway too.
I read this on news now a few weeks ago, seems the rumour was they were against a retractable pitchI think that may be in relation to the ITK's comment about 'the pitch being fine'. Despite all of the speculation, we may not end up having a retractable pitch and have to share the playing surface with the NFL. That really would be a 'sting in the tail' looking at what a debacle Wembley was.
I read this on news now a few weeks ago, seems the rumour was they were against a retractable pitch