- May 7, 2004
- 42,486
- 78,028
- Thread starter
- #161
I want Sutton in the final. Still be nervous though.Why anyone would want Arsenal in the final is beyond me.
I want Sutton in the final. Still be nervous though.Why anyone would want Arsenal in the final is beyond me.
If anything we'll actually be slightly closer to White Hart LaneNo. It's the last ever cup game at the Lane with the stands as they're currently configured. There'll be another cup game at the Lane with newly arranged stands some time in 2018 or 2019.
Testosterone innit.Why do grown men (and pubescent boys) think it's normal to fight other like minded morons just because they support a different team??
I want Sutton in the final. Still be nervous though.
Why do grown men (and pubescent boys) think it's normal to fight other like minded morons just because they support a different team??
No. It's the last ever cup game at the Lane with the stands as they're currently configured. There'll be another cup game at the Lane with newly arranged stands some time in 2018 or 2019.
The date/TV won't be confirmed until Friday. We go through against Gent and it'll probably be 2pm Sunday.
Imagine losing that game. It would probably be the biggest story in football history, and it would be at our expense.
It doesn't sound like anything that would happen to Spurs. Surely not...
The first game of football I ever saw live as a young teenager was at the old Den. Millwall vs Wimbledon who had Hans Segers in goal. Millwall had Sheringham and Cascarino and Terry Hurlock.
The game was a bore draw but was notable for being the first game with a disabled linesman. The guy had stumpy arms and had the flag gaffa-taped to one of them. The abuse he got from the Millwall fans was like nothing I'd ever heard, fucking horrific really.
I'm quite curious and I'm sure this is a question for another thread and another discussion but why do certain clubs eg millwall, West spam etc have such a history of bad behaviour. Is it the make up of their fans? Where they're from perhaps?
I am sure we have and have had fans but instantly as soon as the draw came out most of us were like riot time. But if anyone had drawn us they wouldn't think come to that conclusion.
Most clubs including ours have always had an element. West Ham were more organised than most and millwall were more vicious than most. Most clubs had their element suppressed by new ticketing prices, better policing and all seater stadiums. Millwall stayed in the lower leagues and even though they had all the above happen to them, they kept their local working class support. There's a hell of a lot more trouble at dozens of clubs across the country but because millwall have this reputation, people expect it of them.
This game in particular is a big deal but so would any millwall game against premiership London clubs (except palace).
That's the way I see it anyway.
It's location for starters. There's other elements, but that's where it starts.I'm quite curious and I'm sure this is a question for another thread and another discussion but why do certain clubs eg millwall, West spam etc have such a history of bad behaviour. Is it the make up of their fans? Where they're from perhaps?
I am sure we have and have had fans but instantly as soon as the draw came out most of us were like riot time. But if anyone had drawn us they wouldn't think come to that conclusion.
But what makes them stuck in the dark ages. What makes them more vicious and organised etc.
I am sure other parts have this reputation too like Leeds for example. I guess millwall is just synonymous with fighting and hooliganism. Like look on Saturday how they approach Leicester fans now I can't stand Leicester fans and they're all ****s but what beef does millwall have with leicester,