- Jun 27, 2013
- 6,752
- 16,378
Well we'd better do it soon before Aurier signs.You and Dan should get a room
Well we'd better do it soon before Aurier signs.You and Dan should get a room
Just because ones a douch and ones nice they still get fed the same information although I'm sure Dan gets abit more specifically about us."Journalist" is a pretty generous label to give Lyall.
Dan is the kind who actually goes to press conferences. Travels around the world for pre-season and regular season games with the team sitting in the press box. Attends some youth games as well I believe. He also garners good relationships with others which sometimes bears the fruit of genuine information.
Lyall is basically your run of the mill fake ITK Twitter twat who Sky hired who doesn't really put in leg work and simply farms off others. Others who happen to all have realized who and what he is and he's generally detested for being a fraud. I could accomplish the job he does and I don't even live in the country.
Just because they're both hired by news agencies doesn't make them equal.
Ah yes, Football Whispers. The website I often land on when trying click the forum link on my mobileCompletely agree with this. His Eriksen and KWP articles for Football Whispers notwithstanding (which were weird and out of character),
Nah they're arguing about being a professional and honoring a contract and going awol. TBF what we would be if one of ours did what he is doing.Have any of the Blue Moon ITKs got anything to say on it?
Nah they're arguing about being a professional and honoring a contract and going awol. TBF what we would be if one of ours did what he is doing.
No earthly idea but we've been doing it about Rose and his interview so I can assume yes?You're probably right, and admittedly he's no where near the profile of player (and he went to Palace not Chelsea), but did we about Nya Kirby?
Nah they're arguing about being a professional and honoring a contract and going awol. TBF what we would be if one of ours did what he is doing.
Makes no sense, as scholarships are not like pro-contracts. We approach FA, and player is interviewed. If all above board, we are allowed to compensate. It is news o me that. Citeh in this case can stop him playing for us and hold him to his SC. that does not wash. The kid is a 17 year old child crying out loud. There has to be something more to this. I know they wanted a ridiculously sell on clause. Soon find out.
I read the rules yesterday and summarised them in an earlier post.
The rules are clear. City are required to cancel Sancho's contract if that's what he wantsbut he then can't sign for another club for 2 years unless the new club pays the prescribed compensation - a small amount linked to appearances and 5% of future transfer fees.
Clubs are barred from inducing scholarship players to leave their clubs but by all accounts it's clear that in this instance the initiative has come from the player.
Basically if he wants to join us City cannot stop him.
I read the rules yesterday and summarised them in an earlier post.
The rules are clear. City are required to cancel Sancho's contract if that's what he wantsbut he then can't sign for another club for 2 years unless the new club pays the prescribed compensation - a small amount linked to appearances and 5% of future transfer fees.
Clubs are barred from inducing scholarship players to leave their clubs but by all accounts it's clear that in this instance the initiative has come from the player.
Basically if he wants to join us City cannot stop him.
There you go. If the prescribed club pays the compensation, which allegedly could be the dispute as to how much they want. If he leaves before his scholarship period is up, and compensation is not paid, he cannot play for 2 years. Now there 'may' be a 5m cap. Does not mean citeh have to play along. There goes the monkey.
I thought it was just me; I never knew others went through the same pain.Ah yes, Football Whispers. The website I often land on when trying click the forum link on my mobile
but itk (hertyid) said fee is not the issue, don't know wtf is going on thereIf we can't agree the cash between us does it then go to a tribunal to decide the compo? All seems mad over such a relatively small amount (in todays market rather than 'real life'!) for a player of his potential.
I guess "We are delighted to announced player pending City recovering from state of denial and being an arse about it" doesn't have quite the same ring to it? I am still hopeful for this if for no other reason than Dan is the only one reporting it.There you go. If the prescribed club pays the compensation, which allegedly could be the dispute as to how much they want. If he leaves before his scholarship period is up, and compensation is not paid, he cannot play for 2 years. Now there 'may' be a 5m cap. Does not mean citeh have to play along. There goes the monkey.
Didn't he sign on Wednesday?FFS, do what it takes to sign him
I thought he was already in the bag