Gallas Is worth having about for the season.
Kaboul and Vertonghen will be first choice and caulker is a great replacement or swap about with them two.
I love dawson but we should cash in if possible - funds would be useful and maybe we could try bring another kid through for next season.
His served us well though. I'd clap him in his last game for us.
I think gallas feels he needs to be deeper as he ain't as young and quick as the others. Also he is weary that Friedel isn't so quick off his line.
Lloris is lightening off his line and I am sure if we play him it will only help the high line we play, even though Brad has great qualities - this tips things for Lloris IMO
Easy to create scapegoats like Gallas you have to look at the wider picture
This is probably the best paragraph I've ever read on SC.The reason we aren't playing well is that we have one decent striker and he's only started twice, a few of our best players are injured, we have two lazy and reasonably unintelligent wingers, a big fat non metronome waddling around the midfield, no fucking left back, a tubby line hugging keeper most of the season, and a slow, stupid centre back with minimal leadership qualities and a penchant for humping it long to our 2 foot tall striker will not solve these problems.
This is probably the best paragraph I've ever read on SC.
I'm curious why you think my post is 'ridiculous'. You might like to note - if it's relevant to your opinion - that I didn't say that Dawson should play instead.Fair enough, my comments were aimed more at some of the others, particularly the ridiculous OP.
I have repeatedly said that Gallas is not the future and that when all are fit he probably won't start, certainly not as first choice. But Dawson is not the future either and is not the answer for the here and now either. I don't get why Gallas would be more trouble than Dawson (a player AVB tried to offload who would surely see AVB as a threat to his career and more likely to stir up trouble for him of the pair) in the dressing room ?
Really? I agree with most of it though. I'm not a fan of dawson and his penchant for the long diagonal but I think he gives it away less than gallas. Stop going back to the keeper who then has to hit it long. When he does play it forward it's often a lottery. can't argue about huddlestone either can't wait to see him out the side.
I'm curious why you think my post is 'ridiculous'. You might like to note - if it's relevant to your opinion - that I didn't say that Dawson should play instead.
Caulker and Vertonghen would be my choice, which is evident from my reference in my original post to having three young players in the back four. I'm not sure how the opinion of other people about something that I didn't say makes my post 'ridiculous'; perhaps you can enlighten me.No you didn't, others did though. But I'm not sure who you think should play given our current circumstances if not Dawson.
Walker was far better last season than this. This season he has had Gallas next to him nearly every game. Last season he didn't. You obviously think that's just a coincidence. As for ridiculous, I think your assessment of Walker qualifies. He's a young, talented player who is learning his game (and working on his weaknesses) at the sharp end. Your opinion of him is 'ridiculously' over the top.You just made the even more ridiculous assessment that Gallas was causing Walker problems. Walker is an un-intelligent footballer, who reads the game badly, has bad technique, especially under pressure and has caused us far more problems than Gallas this season.
Gallas actually gives the ball away less than all of our regular defenders this season. Of The CB's, his completion rate is 91%, Caulker 89%, Vertonghen 85%, Dawson's is 75%.
His passing is perfunctory I know. I'm not saying he's a visionary, I know Vertongehn is better on the ball and his much better vision with his passing etc.
Caulker and Vertonghen would be my choice, which is evident from my reference in my original post to having three young players in the back four. I'm not sure how the opinion of other people about something that I didn't say makes my post 'ridiculous'; perhaps you can enlighten me.
Walker was far better last season than this. This season he has had Gallas next to him nearly every game. Last season he didn't. You obviously think that's just a coincidence. As for ridiculous, I think your assessment of Walker qualifies. He's a young, talented player who is learning his game (and working on his weaknesses) at the sharp end. Your opinion of him is 'ridiculously' over the top.
You seem to believe that a great many of our players are 'unintelligent'; I recall that you described Bale and Lennon thus in an earlier post. What do you mean by it? Perhaps you could tell me who you think is an 'intelligent' footballer.
By the way, I'm still waiting for you to tell us all which games you think that Gallas has won for us this season.
Walker's been better clearly, because he's never played for Arsenal.
By the way, I'm still waiting for you to tell us all which games you think that Gallas has won for us this season.
Jesus christ OP. Gallas is playing as our back up to Kaboul. As a back up to Kaboul i think he is better than Dawson.
Dawson problem he is slow, but Gallas is very very slow, Gallas is better for looking for short passes, Dawson looks more often for long balls, but defensivily? Dawson is good on the air while Gallas is so weak. Also Dawson can make slide tackles, lead the back-line better.
In Jan i do think we need to see quite a bit of squad change, i don't even think it needs to cost too much, we could get some experienced pros in for cheaper, just so long as they can work with AVB's style of play.