- Jul 19, 2015
- 6,647
- 27,841
Not good for Dier, hooked after 28 mins
Jose will say that at 0-2 at home you have to sacrifice your DCM.
Not good for Dier, hooked after 28 mins
So, I stick up for Dier and he has a mare! ? At least Jose knows he has a big job on his hands now!
I thought Dier was pretty poor against West Ham could not see what the pundits saw in his performance.. He looks like he needs a pre season
Jose will say that at 0-2 at home you have to sacrifice your DCM.
He will also say that he could have pulled off a defender instead....
"We were losing 2-0, they were closing really well and I needed a second man with Dele Alli to come into the pockets. It was between Dier and Harry Winks but a hard decision. They understand, Eric understands but the reality it is never a easy and to make it clear, it was about the team not individuals. I thought about taking out one of the centre-backs and putting Eric in defence."
Any other input tonight?Well I thought based off your previous posts Dier can't be coached (and Mourinho isn't here to improve him), was never good enough in 15/16, and never will be good enough for this team? At least we're all on the same page now that maybe with a run of games he could potentially recover his previous form and be an asset to Mou's side (at least until January) after you've been repeatedly attacking our understanding of football for daring to state this initially. I do appreciate you explaining the definition of an argument though, it's a difficult concept for most of us thick-headed posters to understand.
I'm all for hearing differing options, including your own, but you don't have to call everyone stupid for having one. The only person I've seen post in this thread with "misguided confidence in one's own opinion" is yourself.
He's got that in him. but be careful as he's got friends in high places round these parts that are similarly shouty-downy. Ignore's a good option as the input is predictable anyway.Mm. I’m not sure what’s wrong with you, aside from being a thoroughgoing milquetoast but I’ve noticed that you plunge into some delerious tantrum every time someone criticises one of our players, this time by calling me a liar for having an opinion that causes your ovaries to oscillate at an untenable frequency.
He’s meant to be our defensive midfielder and like defensive midfielders for other teams, make tackles and interceptions. He doesn’t. And it’s not just this game it’s every game, and it’s over every season. He’s nowhere near other good defensive mids in terms of his contribution.
I was perfectly decent and polite and didn’t say you are a liar for having your own subjective take on things- which is, by the way, impossible - no matter how imbecilic and contrary to the facts it is. You haven’t demonstrated any tangible evidence that has any relevance, yet ignored the tangible evidence I provided ie. His astonishing lack of tackles and interceptions as a defensive midfielder relative to other, good, players in his positions.
It’s more than a little pathetic that you haven’t developed the ability to disagree civilly, as I attempted to. I’m very sorry you can’t take any criticism of spurs players without going all blubbery, passive aggressive and weird. Lol