I always suspected that under his cool 'dont give a shit' attitude, that really, he does.
Sneaking into every game to watch us play doesnt sound very apathetic to me. He is a yiddo and he knows it.
If he is our left back for the next 3-4 years that would be fine with me, there are only a few better and none we can reasonably get.
Best LB we've had in years and people want to get rid of him for a one season wonder living off a wonder goal meal ticket. Do me a favour.
Best LB we've had in years and people want to get rid of him for a one season wonder living off a wonder goal meal ticket. Do me a favour.
Not sure I'd want to replace him with Rose, though not sure I wouldn't either. Not sure I want to replace him at all. The thing is though, is that imo he doesn't really suit AVB's preferred way of playing.
Absolutely nothing to do with Rose for me. Purely Economics.
We brought him for a few million when he was young, develop and get some use out of him and then sell for a profit. The guy will turn 30 next season, and he has only two years on his contract, his value can only go down from now on and the way the club has to be run it is time to get what ever money we can for him.
Maybe harsh, but got to be done in my eyes.
Its not good economics when we would still need to buy a back up for Rose. And then, also replace Rose a year down the line when we realise he isnt that good.
For me BAE's strengths have been calmness on the ball, particularly in the defensive third of the pitch, which in turn means we can build better from the back; it's often his bit of skill which instigates a lightning counter-attack. I think he's generally tidy in possession as well. His other strength is in reading the game, and he makes a high number of interceptions a season. His weaknesses are both in chasing forwards, making the over-lap and playing decent balls into the box, and in chasing back, giving everything to get back on terms and preventing the opposition from getting the ball into the box. He is not a high-energy full-back in the mould of Walker (more of which in a sec), and I think he can lack a bit of heart at times.
I think that in a 433 with inverted forwards you need full-backs who will get forward and join in with the attacks, and that who can also sprint back 70 yards when the ball is lost. You need 800m runner style full-backs in as much as they're quick, but also have got the stamina of a horse. Once forward they need to be good at picking out the quick ball, be that a pull-back, a cross, a through-ball whatever. This does not play to BAE's strengths at all.
As for Walker on the other side, his decision making is not as good as BAE's, he doesn't read the game as well, he has less composure on the ball, his final ball in an attacking sense is also not very good. He is quick though, he has heart, he will never give up, and even if he's lost the ball at their end, he will kill himself to get back, and he'll keep doing that all match. If you had a FB with Walker's speed, strength and desire, and BAE's composure and reading of the game, he'd be some full-back (although he'd still have to work on his final ball!).
I think the reason people are talking about replacing BAE and not Walker is that BAE is that much older, and the things he lacks are harder to learn.
I'd be quite upset if we lost him. He needs competition, he hasn't had a good season. but he had a big injury and I reckon, with a smooth run going into the new season, the old magnificent Benny will be back. He's in his prime and is a superb footballer and, whether first choice or not, would be a huge loss to the squad we have here.
Surprised people aren't discussing his covert attendance more on here. Isn't he good mates with Ade? Can you imagine the conversations between them??
”So Benny, what did the fans have to say?'
”Erm...you might want to sit down for this mate LOL'