I don't want to see Townsend go. He was a bright spark when coming on against West Ham in a match that was just simply quite dull at least when looking at our performance. I still without a doubt think he could be a good asset to have from the bench.
Ludicrous to compare the reaction each team had when Lamela and Townsend came on. Lamela came on and made the TEAM better, then went and had actual production in creating two goals. Townsend conversely gets absolutely no production and all he did was come in against a 10 men West Ham side and get off a couple shots from distance.Agreed no point selling Towsend unless we are bringing a winger or wide attacker replacement. We have to have variety to do something different if things don`t go to plan and Townsend and Lennon are great options off the bench when the game is getting stretched..
Too many people in this forum only think about one formation and the first 11 players ... but this is a squad game and Townsend was great when he came on against West Ham, likewise Lamela changed the game when he came on in Cyprus after being quite ordinary against West Ham.
Ludicrous to compare the reaction each team had when Lamela and Townsend came on. Lamela came on and made the TEAM better, then went and had actual production in creating two goals. Townsend conversely gets absolutely no production and all he did was come in against a 10 men West Ham side and get off a couple shots from distance.
Townsend very simply does not provide enough to the team or as an individual. He is selfish and gets absolutely no results for it.
I agree that the team can benefit from having different style attacking players, but Townsend is just not one of them. He makes zero contributions to this team and team is the key word here as that's what Poch is trying to build. Townsend seems a long ways away from learning how to play under a team setting.
No. I think we're fine with selling him because he isn't an attacking player. In theory he is, but again the proof is in the pudding and he hasn't provided any production. We could bring in any of other other subs and get the same or more production from them than Townsend has given us so far. For example lets say the starting top 4 is Ade-Chadli-Eriksen-Lamela, we could bring on any of Holtby, Paulinho, Kane, Soldado, or even Lennon on and they could impact the game just as well as Townsend could.But surely you agree no point selling him if we do not get an attacking replacement in addition to schniederlin
I don't think he plays for himself, I just think he doesn't have the footballing intelligence to play any other way. His game has always been based around beating players and shooting/crossing. If you contrast that with Lamela, he is always looking to pass first because he understands that it is the most effective way of getting into good positions. Only once an opportunity presents itself does Lamela try to dribble etc. If townsend could learn that he would be a great player. Unfortunately I don't see any signs of that happening!We need players playing for the team.
Andros plays for team Andros.
Would be some player if he played for his team mates.
Learn or leave, Andros over to you.
I think if we bringing in a wide a left striker or winger for example Jay Rodriguez then I have no issue with selling him... Otherwise I say let Pochettino try to improve him as he obviously has talent but needs to learn to be more productive.
I put him in the same same boat as Holtby and Paulinho. To be fair Chadli and Lamela only started to step up in the last couple of games so there is hope..
He's their most reliable ITK.If any of you are done beating your meat to the fazio news and read this, Guan 2.0, resident SaintsWeb ITK, confirmed today that there is something to the Townsend rumors on the saints end...
#6625Guan 2.0 Today, 02:51 PM
Originally Posted by SuperSAINT
Guan's last post: So we know the Townsend stuff is true then
Pretty much!
Acutally Mate, that wasn't Guan's last post- he was referring to a different post by Guan in which he said this:If any of you are done beating your meat to the fazio news and read this, Guan 2.0, resident SaintsWeb ITK, confirmed today that there is something to the Townsend rumors on the saints end...
#6625Guan 2.0 Today, 02:51 PM
Originally Posted by SuperSAINT
Guan's last post: So we know the Townsend stuff is true then
Pretty much!
If the Townswnd stuff is true, i will not bother to post but just save time and facepalm 100 times.
Acutally Mate, that wasn't Guan's last post- he was referring to a different post by Guan in which he said this:
So he hasn't posted in ages so the Saints fans are wondering if it's true...
£12m is pretty close to silly money though IMO.Said from the start I didnt believe we'd let Townsend go unless it was silly money.
There not overly keen on Townsend. Saints forum
What? They don't think they can use a winger who dribbles past players and then shoots whenever he gets 40 yards from the goal?There not overly keen on Townsend. Saints forum