dontcallme
SC Supporter
- Mar 18, 2005
- 34,443
- 84,030
I kind of agree. But I thought we had that with Paratici and Conte. There were still lots of stories about Levy meddling.
The ousting of Daniel (COYS)
- Thread starter ChappersES
- Start date
srups34
Well-Known Member
- Jun 11, 2008
- 2,595
- 5,477
Totally agree but with Munn coming in I'd be hoping this time it's different.
Albertbarich
Well-Known Member
- Jul 4, 2020
- 5,285
- 20,055
He will never fully step away as it's his baby.
Plus anyone new can't rip up our wage budget which is a factor in why we won't compete with the very best.
SirNiNyHotspur
23 Years of Property, Concerts, Karts & Losing
- Apr 27, 2004
- 3,132
- 6,771
Impressive, he comes across almost as likable as his hero Dan. Telling someone how to bring up their kid and in a such a derogatory tone, again impressive.And this is why I put you on ignore, showing your true colours here.
DarwinSpur
Well-Known Member
- Dec 30, 2020
- 6,019
- 10,625
The loan got paid back when the Club was sold. So effectviely got paid twice for his theft of Russian peoples money. Once as he was allowed to Sportwash his presence in UK. And once when he was forced to sell.
Win win for the oiligarch. What a wonderful world we live in.
DarwinSpur
Well-Known Member
- Dec 30, 2020
- 6,019
- 10,625
Okay so I know your criteria now and I broadly agree with it - except to note that it describes every Oil Slave owner and Abramovich.
But, like I asked @Drink!Drink! can you put a name to these potential new owners. Do any of them exist in the spending chart you posted? Or are we back to what I identified earlier when you posted about Joe Lewis and Argentina: that you want an Oil slave state to buy us. There's nothing wrong with having that view. I don't share it but that's okay. But just be honest and transparent about it so we know what the debate is.
- Feb 1, 2005
- 55,665
- 205,686
- Admin
- #5,127
You're trolling and I suspect for a number of posters it's getting boring now. Especially with this persistent suggestion that anything you don't like boils down to wanting dodgy oil owners or whatnot. That's almost certainly a bit of a pop to get under their skins.
Nobody has to put a name to anyone, that's just ridiculous.......i'm pretty sure nobody would have heard of half the new owners of football clubs before they dipped their toe in. It's a bullshit deflecting device and an impossible requirement to fill. IF a new owner puts his hand up, that's when people will decide what's what as to their suitability.
Last edited:
13VanDerBale13
Well-Known Member
- Jul 12, 2011
- 14,579
- 34,253
Exactly this, when will people realise, until he’s gone, we’ll keep experiencing these painful lows
ComfortablyNumb
Well-Known Member
- Jun 28, 2011
- 4,035
- 6,190
Most of the stories were about Paratici being a crook, and Conte being a surprisingly poor coach.
DarwinSpur
Well-Known Member
- Dec 30, 2020
- 6,019
- 10,625
I am absolutely not trolling and I find it staggering that asking the question "Who takes over" in a thread when a section of Spurs fans are asking us as a community to take direct action to remove our current owners is somehow considered "trolling".
I'm asking to be convinced by argument. Part of that, for me and others, absolutely depends on who we think might take the club over. No one wants to answer. Maybe you're right and it doesn't matter to the majority? If so fine. For the sake of the peace I'll move on.
dontcallme
SC Supporter
- Mar 18, 2005
- 34,443
- 84,030
There were both. You only have to read our itks from last summer and January to see that.
JUSTINSIGNAL
Well-Known Member
- Jul 10, 2008
- 16,033
- 48,769
Come on mate, he’s part owner and a genuine fan ffs. You might not rate the guy but he has every right to attend matches.
if it’s not helping the atmosphere maybe fans shouid take responsibility for their actions rather than turn it toxic to the detriment of the team.
As Trix put it, I’m happy with the amount of money being put into the club recently. We’re spending more and bringing in bigger purchases, which is good.
I’m not happy with the way it’s being spent. Spending 60 million on a backup forward is all well and good but it came at the expense of us signing a solid LCB and RWB, which has hurt the team in the process. The recruitment strategy is nonexistent and a lot of the purchases we have made seem scattergun and lack any type of thought. On the whole I’m OK with ENIC, but With the ITK and media explaining Levy’s involvement, he needs to step away.
I’m not happy with the way it’s being spent. Spending 60 million on a backup forward is all well and good but it came at the expense of us signing a solid LCB and RWB, which has hurt the team in the process. The recruitment strategy is nonexistent and a lot of the purchases we have made seem scattergun and lack any type of thought. On the whole I’m OK with ENIC, but With the ITK and media explaining Levy’s involvement, he needs to step away.
ComfortablyNumb
Well-Known Member
- Jun 28, 2011
- 4,035
- 6,190
I read your post as implying that Paratici and Conte were undermined by Levy’s reported interference. My take is that their effectiveness was undermined by their lack of ability in their respective roles. I’m not interested in the statistical distribution of posts.
Chirpystheman
Well-Known Member
- Jan 22, 2019
- 501
- 1,610
dontcallme
SC Supporter
- Mar 18, 2005
- 34,443
- 84,030
My post was primarily about Levy. A post stayed if Levy stepped back and let the football run the football side of things he’d be happy.
I pointed out that there were many stories suggesting Levy still was meddling.
How good a job Conte and Paratici did was not relevant to the post.
- Feb 1, 2005
- 55,665
- 205,686
- Admin
- #5,139
mil1lion
This is the place to be
- May 7, 2004
- 42,676
- 78,540
I'm just fed up seeing him to be honest. He's hardly a fan either.
I think I'm just more annoyed that they keep showing him every time we're playing. I'm just bored seeing him with his serious look all the time
