What's new

Where do we go now?

jbstarr14

Well-Known Member
Aug 19, 2010
1,506
5,165
tumblr_o3dg01MyiO1rjrfgoo2_250.gifv
Sadly, I fear that ‘Welcome to the Jungle’ more accurately fits our current predicament...
 

dudu

Well-Known Member
Jan 28, 2011
5,314
11,048
That's not true is it.

League Cup Final - Man City much better side and stronger squad
Champions League Final - Liverpool a much better Side and stronger squad
League Cup Semi Final vs Chelsea - Chelsea had a much better side particularly down to our injuries
F.A Cup Semi Final vs United - We were playing better football than them in this moment but they clearly had the more expensively assembled squad and we were punching above our weight
F.A Cup Semi final vs Chelsea - They were the best team in the country in this season, they won the league and they had the ability to bring on heavy hitters from the bench to turn the game that we simply didn't.
League Cup Final vs Chelsea - Jose Mourinho were unstoppable that season and clearly the better side
League Cup Final vs United - Clearly the much better side

We were punching above our weight every season to be in those semi finals and finals, in the domestic cup aspects there luck of the draw in some regard but not in a single one of those had Levy assembled a squad whereby it put us in the position to be favourites for those.

Ok, I digress, not favourites but we have never been in a more favourable position to win those games in my lifetime and the teams he assembled were good enough to get us there in the first place.



[/QUOTE]
 

NEVILLEB

Well-Known Member
Nov 6, 2006
6,797
6,447
This new wave of Poch revisionism is the problem. People need to (finally) accept that whilst he did very well, he also made mistakes that contributed towards a slide. He was here for the current state we are in, and not an awful lot has changed. Kane was over-played, Eriksen was over-played, Dele was allowed to become complacent. Many anticipated academy players were locked out. The league was prioritised over domestic cups. (etc. etc.)

Mourinho was a poor appointment, but I think it made sense at the time. Ideally, we need someone who believes they can do something with our younger players, as that's been the backbone for success at our rivals.

We will go one of two ways - a young manager for a new project, or a Conte/Allegri type to try and satisfy the fans in the short term. United did that with LVG and Mourinho, and Chelsea do it a lot, but it doesn't give long term stability.

Sorry but I couldn’t get past ‘Kane was overplayed’.

Can you think why that might have happened?
 

walton

Well-Known Member
Feb 28, 2006
3,218
5,069
One of the most depressing things about this situation is the inevitability of what will happen next. We genuinely have an opportunity to do things different now - to adopt a successful European model of the likes of Ajax, Dortmund, etc. We have the money to be able to do it...we have incredible facilities and somehow we still have incredible clout. But we won't. We'll throw that money at a stop gap manager, who'll maybe do well for a short period until it goes tits up again. This for me is where the approach of Levy et al. is indefensible. It suggests they are stupid, or they have no real interest in building something sustainable to succeed.

Given the ESL shitshow and the circus around Mourinho, if now isn't the time for ambitious change, then it never will be.
 

joelstinton14

Well-Known Member
Aug 23, 2011
1,295
3,429
We just carry on and rebuild as we always have done. May have a few bumpy years but we got a chance to start a new page, new manager, new players and just go for it.

We were always in a position where we lost our best players. We almost qualified for the CL under Jol, lost carrick and berbatov. Had a couple of rough years. Reinvested and had a wonderful team under Harry whilst qualifying for the champions league for the first time. Lost Modric. Lost Harry when he had his head turned by the England job. AvB came in and had a mixed time of it, but Bale in that season was unstoppable. We lost him. A couple of rough years but reinvested and then Poch happened. Regular champions league football, reaching a final, title contenders in the league. Lost Poch. A rough couple of years. May lose Kane and Son.

But we always seem to bounce back. No one is ever irreplaceable. Our trajectory seems to be one step back two forward. It may look grim right now but give it a couple of seasons and who knows. The off field infrastructure is there now. One less thing to focus on.

And it happens to other clubs. We always expect to be competing but having dips are natural. How many managers have Man Utd gone through since Sir Alex? Even now some aren’t convinced by Ole. How many managers did Liverpool appoint post Benitez? And pre Klopp? How many seasons in a row did we finish above them (6/7?). How many managers have Chelsea gone through in the years between Jose stints? How many have Arsenal gone through post wenger? City have the odd year where they fluff it and finish fourth. It just our turn at the moment.
 

Maxtremist

Well-Known Member
Jun 11, 2014
1,531
3,300
One of the most depressing things about this situation is the inevitability of what will happen next. We genuinely have an opportunity to do things different now - to adopt a successful European model of the likes of Ajax, Dortmund, etc. We have the money to be able to do it...we have incredible facilities and somehow we still have incredible clout. But we won't. We'll throw that money at a stop gap manager, who'll maybe do well for a short period until it goes tits up again. This for me is where the approach of Levy et al. is indefensible. It suggests they are stupid, or they have no real interest in building something sustainable to succeed.

Given the ESL shitshow and the circus around Mourinho, if now isn't the time for ambitious change, then it never will be.

What is that ambitious change for you? Is it the manager? The players we're buying? All of it?
Why is a pandemic when fans haven't been in the stadium for over a year the now or never moment?

Comparisons to Dortmund and Ajax are... difficult too cause they're models also rely on the leagues they're in and the competition they've got in their leagues.
Also what do you mean by their successful European models? I mean Dortmund are having a bad season this year. Even with Haaland and Sancho and their stars they are in a very real possibility of not making the CL. They're also likely going to sell Haaland and Sancho and any other stars they get. So too will Ajax and all their stars. So are you suggesting we just stick to being a selling club? Or Successful in just qualifying for Europe each year? (which we have been doing).

Do Ajax and Dortmund have a Manchester City and Manchester United and Chelsea and Liverpool and Arsenal and Leicester to compete with on a yearly basis?

When we went from AVB to Sherwood to Poch, did we think it was inevitable we'd be stuck in a downward cycle and then were surprised by Poch?
 

Gspurs11

Well-Known Member
Aug 19, 2012
1,949
8,674
The annoying thing is if Levy gets the next appointment wrong, there's no accountability as he is part-owner of the club. We had ITK a while ago, and i may be misremembering, but it said Uncle Joe wasn't too keen on Mourinho and it was on Levy's head - i think it was from someone reliable but can't remember who.
 

HodisGawd

Well-Known Member
Oct 3, 2005
1,746
5,959
The annoying thing is if Levy gets the next appointment wrong, there's no accountability as he is part-owner of the club. We had ITK a while ago, and i may be misremembering, but it said Uncle Joe wasn't too keen on Mourinho and it was on Levy's head - i think it was from someone reliable but can't remember who.
Mourinho was always a big risk and Levy showed balls by hiring him. It did not work out. I don't think we can blame Levy for that, he rolled the dice but his numbers didn't come up. I just think Mourinho was a bit rubbish, he thought he could turn up and win things. With us, you need more than that.

And yes, there is no accountability. That's not something specific to Levy, Enic or Joe Lewis. It's because football clubs are not democracies, they are owned. Until the ownership model changes, which it won't, then we have to lump it. If we were taken over it would be the same, perhaps worse. Look at the Glazers - there's even less accountability there. They have absolutely no relationship with the fans, good, bad or otherwise.
 

Gspurs11

Well-Known Member
Aug 19, 2012
1,949
8,674
Mourinho was always a big risk and Levy showed balls by hiring him. It did not work out. I don't think we can blame Levy for that, he rolled the dice but his numbers didn't come up. I just think Mourinho was a bit rubbish, he thought he could turn up and win things. With us, you need more than that.

And yes, there is no accountability. That's not something specific to Levy, Enic or Joe Lewis. It's because football clubs are not democracies, they are owned. Until the ownership model changes, which it won't, then we have to lump it. If we were taken over it would be the same, perhaps worse. Look at the Glazers - there's even less accountability there. They have absolutely no relationship with the fans, good, bad or otherwise.

I agree with all of that, I'm just a bit fed up and disillusioned with it all.
 

freeeki

Arsehole.
Aug 5, 2008
11,856
69,554
Mourinho was always a big risk and Levy showed balls by hiring him. It did not work out. I don't think we can blame Levy for that, he rolled the dice but his numbers didn't come up. I just think Mourinho was a bit rubbish, he thought he could turn up and win things. With us, you need more than that.

And yes, there is no accountability. That's not something specific to Levy, Enic or Joe Lewis. It's because football clubs are not democracies, they are owned. Until the ownership model changes, which it won't, then we have to lump it. If we were taken over it would be the same, perhaps worse. Look at the Glazers - there's even less accountability there. They have absolutely no relationship with the fans, good, bad or otherwise.

I don't want to state the obvious, but we sacked him 6 days before a final, and replaced him with a caretaker manager with a grand total of 0 games under his belt.
 

joelstinton14

Well-Known Member
Aug 23, 2011
1,295
3,429
One of the most depressing things about this situation is the inevitability of what will happen next. We genuinely have an opportunity to do things different now - to adopt a successful European model of the likes of Ajax, Dortmund, etc. We have the money to be able to do it...we have incredible facilities and somehow we still have incredible clout. But we won't. We'll throw that money at a stop gap manager, who'll maybe do well for a short period until it goes tits up again. This for me is where the approach of Levy et al. is indefensible. It suggests they are stupid, or they have no real interest in building something sustainable to succeed.

Given the ESL shitshow and the circus around Mourinho, if now isn't the time for ambitious change, then it never will be.

I think having a functioning academy takes time. It takes a while for that investment to make a return. It’s only a few years old but hopefully we will start to see more players come through. Japhet as come through, good chance we’ll see Skipp involved next year and then we have the likes of Parrot and Scarlett too. Jack Clarke was doing well this season before he got injured too. I tend to think we are at our best when we sign young players. When you look at some of our best players over the last 20 years Walker, Rose, Bale, Lennon they were young and brought through. Modrić too was relatively young at the time.

I think our problem is actually sticking to that model and having faith with it. I think when we need to make that step, bringing in older players who Danny Rose doesn’t have to google, we forget to refresh in other areas with younger hungry players.

It’s not just the club that needs to have faith with it but fans too. We’re happy to go along with the academy/young talentset up for a couple of years but the way football is we just end up forgetting about it and demanding £75 million superstars.

Its a two way thing though. Club as to have faith with it, but fans need to understand that’s how things are. We have to buy into that identity.
 

double0

Well-Known Member
Aug 29, 2006
14,423
12,258
Unfortunately the large financial gap that has been created in the premier League means that Moussa Sissoko's wages are likely to be way to much for any team that might want him. (Let's be honest, we're not selling him to any team in the top half of the premier League)
So even if we are willing to give these players away, who's buying them?
That's so short sighted. If you have rotten fruit or dead wood you separate the bad from the good otherwise what will happen is it'll all get bad.

If we have to subsidise his wage like what Real Madrid and all other clubs have done with their players in the past unfortunately we have to do it.

I like Sissoko as a professional footballer you can't ask for more model pro...but that's Levy he went and personally done the deal because the re payment was the length of his contract.

The clubs in a mess at the moment we've lost our identity- in how we want to play football we're caught between not winning silverware and being a laughing stock the club like others isn't consulting fans in regards to the superleague. We have fantastic facilities but very mentally poor players... Plus no manager.

The club needs a massive shake up from top to bottom.
 

Gingernut

Well-Known Member
Jul 2, 2019
1,423
3,518
I've just had it confirmed that my ST is deferred for next season so I have another year to try and get some motivation back to even want to watch them play. I'm so disillusioned with it all
 

walton

Well-Known Member
Feb 28, 2006
3,218
5,069
What is that ambitious change for you? Is it the manager? The players we're buying? All of it?
Why is a pandemic when fans haven't been in the stadium for over a year the now or never moment?

Comparisons to Dortmund and Ajax are... difficult too cause they're models also rely on the leagues they're in and the competition they've got in their leagues.
Also what do you mean by their successful European models? I mean Dortmund are having a bad season this year. Even with Haaland and Sancho and their stars they are in a very real possibility of not making the CL. They're also likely going to sell Haaland and Sancho and any other stars they get. So too will Ajax and all their stars. So are you suggesting we just stick to being a selling club? Or Successful in just qualifying for Europe each year? (which we have been doing).

Do Ajax and Dortmund have a Manchester City and Manchester United and Chelsea and Liverpool and Arsenal and Leicester to compete with on a yearly basis?

When we went from AVB to Sherwood to Poch, did we think it was inevitable we'd be stuck in a downward cycle and then were surprised by Poch?

That's a lot of questions! :D

Appreciate the simplistic comparisons with other teams in other leagues, but therein lies the ambition - take the good things from other club models (outside the UK i guess) and apply those to Spurs. If the club has a vision that is built around a more sustainable approach to staff/talent development and management then i don't think anyone would begrudge a few seasons where, like Ajax, Dortmund, etc, we don't hit the highest of heights. What we're struggling with is doing badly and playing in a manner which appears hopeless, whilst in the middle of a seemingly rudderless approach to club management.
 

walton

Well-Known Member
Feb 28, 2006
3,218
5,069
I think having a functioning academy takes time. It takes a while for that investment to make a return. It’s only a few years old but hopefully we will start to see more players come through. Japhet as come through, good chance we’ll see Skipp involved next year and then we have the likes of Parrot and Scarlett too. Jack Clarke was doing well this season before he got injured too. I tend to think we are at our best when we sign young players. When you look at some of our best players over the last 20 years Walker, Rose, Bale, Lennon they were young and brought through. Modrić too was relatively young at the time.

I think our problem is actually sticking to that model and having faith with it. I think when we need to make that step, bringing in older players who Danny Rose doesn’t have to google, we forget to refresh in other areas with younger hungry players.

It’s not just the club that needs to have faith with it but fans too. We’re happy to go along with the academy/young talentset up for a couple of years but the way football is we just end up forgetting about it and demanding £75 million superstars.

Its a two way thing though. Club as to have faith with it, but fans need to understand that’s how things are. We have to buy into that identity.

I agree with a lot of this - the faith of all stakeholders is absolutely critical. There's no use having a 5-year plan with ambitious vision and then shitting the bed after three years; and that's directed at fans too.

I do think, however, that even if we're not winning loads of games, there will likely be evidence that something positive is happening, whether that's a game when a new approach 'clicks' or the appointment of a progressive manager and crop of players, etc. We have none of that just now.
 

Maxtremist

Well-Known Member
Jun 11, 2014
1,531
3,300
That's a lot of questions! :D

Appreciate the simplistic comparisons with other teams in other leagues, but therein lies the ambition - take the good things from other club models (outside the UK i guess) and apply those to Spurs. If the club has a vision that is built around a more sustainable approach to staff/talent development and management then i don't think anyone would begrudge a few seasons where, like Ajax, Dortmund, etc, we don't hit the highest of heights. What we're struggling with is doing badly and playing in a manner which appears hopeless, whilst in the middle of a seemingly rudderless approach to club management.

You say that, but then the narrative will still be trophyless Tottenham and all that. Cause the Ajax/Dortmund models have a degree of safety in that there's not much competition so they can afford to focus on other things like the staff/talent development. If we did that, given the level of competition we'd likely struggle in other areas.

I think, whilst I get your idea, we're stuck between a rock and a hard place. In that we'd almost need a trophy/trophies to keep our best players. But we need to almost take a step back and set up a good bedrock of staff, talent and development to set us up for continued success and we can't easily do both at the same time and the fanbase are split a little on which of those we want most.

Ultimately I think in the immediate, if we can get a manager that can play good football with us then we'll take that. It might not get us CL or trophies but it feels like just giving us something good to watch and trying to compete will do it for now
 

Cavehillspur

Well-Known Member
Jan 28, 2011
14,107
18,467
Here’s hoping Uefa dont hit us with a transfer ban for the esl involvement otherwise we're totally fucked.
 

MassadaTom

Well-Known Member
Aug 8, 2019
1,392
1,636
That's a lot of questions! :D

Appreciate the simplistic comparisons with other teams in other leagues, but therein lies the ambition - take the good things from other club models (outside the UK i guess) and apply those to Spurs. If the club has a vision that is built around a more sustainable approach to staff/talent development and management then i don't think anyone would begrudge a few seasons where, like Ajax, Dortmund, etc, we don't hit the highest of heights. What we're struggling with is doing badly and playing in a manner which appears hopeless, whilst in the middle of a seemingly rudderless approach to club management.
We need CL money thou.Ajax and Dortmund have easy access compared to us.
Every one involved would be fine mounting a challenge to the top evry 3 ,4 years but CL money is required to sustain us on top level. Maybe with stadium we could survive year off but it is costly.
 
Top