stupid comment
if the pass goes sideways and goes 30cm forward its count as forward.
you can use statitcs as you want
stupid comment
stupid comment
@Mackan110
more stats for you
View attachment 44761
here is a good article about how well winks is doing and how he also plays a far more defensive style lately, https://totalfootballanalysis.com/p...ottenham-hotspur-tactical-analysis-statistics
there is more you know.
You're the one that made a statistics-based argument with that rubbish post about him passing forwards, and now you're saying not to trust them. You can't have it both ways.where you got this statics? i check transfermarket (game played)
rabiot score goals - the statics say so but that doesnt make him a forward
dont trust to much in statics
he's not for me, more hassle than he's worth and i am surprised Poch even interested
he was finished there a long time agoPSG have now announced Paredes which surely, surely means Rabiot is finished there
You're the one that made a statistics-based argument with that rubbish post about him passing forwards, and now you're saying not to trust them. You can't have it both ways.
Sure let's not buy anyone just because of the hassle! FFS!
Because it's a pointless discussion and then when we don't sign him after the deadline, people will complain that we haven't signed him even though a very well respected ITK has said a few times we were never in for him. Why discuss a player who we're not in for?!Why does it matter to you?
Nobody is putting a gun to your head and making you read anything in this thread.
If people want to discuss the possibility then they are entitled to do so.
@Mackan110
more stats for you
View attachment 44761
here is a good article about how well winks is doing and how he also plays a far more defensive style lately, https://totalfootballanalysis.com/p...ottenham-hotspur-tactical-analysis-statistics
there is more you know.
You did. Saying a player doesn't pass forwards is a statistics-based argument, whether you quote a source or not, because it's something that can be easily quantified.i didnt use any statics. i watch the games and have my eyes open. im not the only one that have this point. but obvious someones feelings got hurt.
Im sorry for that
i didnt use any statics. i watch the games and have my eyes open. im not the only one that have this point. but obvious someones feelings got hurt.
Im sorry for that
I'm not sure that's true it'd be very difficult to get that many passes exactly perpendicular.if the pass goes sideways and goes 30cm forward its count as forward.
you can use statitcs as you want
No, statisticians get the protractor out when counting passes. Only passes at a 90 degree angle count as square passes. Anything forward or backward of 90 degrees is a pass forward or backwardI'm not sure that's true it'd be very difficult to get that many passes exactly perpendicular.
i didnt use any statics. i watch the games and have my eyes open.
Why do you think we’re even chasing this still? No tangible link after jj shot it down again.Hope we don't chase this all the way to deadline day... we all know how that one ends.