Got to sort whatever can be recycled etc. too.
The demolition will be quick I would guess, but the sorting and then transportation of everything will take time.
Standing at the top of a giant chimney knocking it down from under yourself one brick at a time with a sledgehammer, now that's where it really gets exciting.Looking at those pictures and I think I've just found my dream job
Getting paid to drive big ass machines and demolish stuff, what's not to like.
Standing at the top of a giant chimney knocking it down from under yourself one brick at a time with a sledgehammer, now that's where it really gets exciting.
They'll be pulling it down from the inside so they can go at it a bit.The north stand will be slower they'll have to be careful due to the proximity to the new site.
Totally agree, but still gotta be more careful, especially where it's almost touching the new stadium in the north east corner.They'll be pulling it down from the inside so they can go at it a bit.
Looking at those pictures and I think I've just found my dream job
Getting paid to drive big ass machines and demolish stuff, what's not to like.
Are you gonna tell them?Totally agree, but still gotta be more careful, especially where it's almost touching the new stadium in the north east corner.
That is more careful than just bashing down from the top.Are you gonna tell them?
View attachment 30316
Doesn't look slow though.That is more careful than just bashing down from the top.
Who says we can't play here next season?
Pitch looks fine.
I'm sure Chelsea's pitch looked like that about 10 years ago.Who says we can't play here next season?
Pitch looks fine.
Not sure if this has been covered before, but looking at the amount of land between the West Stand and the High Road, rather than demolishing the whole ground and starting again, could we not have just pulled down the West Stand and built a new, much bigger and better-featured West Stand with three tiers? Surely we could have added up to 10,000 seats that way?
Clearly the brand new stadium will have ~15,000 more seats than that might have resulted in, but at a much, much grater cost. I guess Levy et al are banking on the predicted greater commercial profile of the club / new ground increasing our future earning potential above and beyond the extra cost associated with a complete rebuild?