- Jan 20, 2006
- 45,213
- 8,229
I suggested this last week, or possibly the week before. Rule nothing out.
75k a week on a crock who can manage only 50% of the games of Terry (150k a week) Ferdinand (120k a week) who play 60 plus games a season.
How can a club that is so restricted in wage structures validate this, anyone else find this hard to fathom?
75k a week on a crock who can manage only 50% of the games of Terry (150k a week) Ferdinand (120k a week) who play 60 plus games a season.
How can a club that is so restricted in wage structures validate this, anyone else find this hard to fathom?
Could it not be that we are going for both Crouch and Hunt? I just got this feeling that Pav is on his way out too (I hope not)
I hate when Redknapp mentions players when we havent sealed the deal. I think its very amateurish. I would prefer he mentions that we are interested in players where behind the scenes we have signed them already
I think the Hunterlaar deal is looking less and less likely now.
It seems as though Crouch will be signed and Bent moved on to Sunderland. I would expect that to be the sum of our dealings in terms of our strikers.
It's not inconciveable that he could still be brought into replace one of Pav or Keane (depending on Redknapp's opinion of those) but I would say it is unlikely.
Crouch and Defoe was his first choice partnership at Pompey and looks as if he is going to recreate that with us.
Why bring in Hunterlaar also? He would only be signed as a first choice striker surely and would would expect the same for Crouch. So unless Defoe were to be relegated to the bench in favour of a Crouch and Hunterlaar partnership I really can't see either (Crouch and Hunterlaar) being brought in for a huge fee and big wages to be 3/4th choice strikers.
I now fully expect to see Crouch and Defoe as our starting strikers next season with Pav covering and rotating with Crouch and KEane doing the same with Defoe (and of course each fighting for the starting spots.)
My main/only reservation about us signing Crouch is my distaste for managers trying to reproduce excatly what they had at another club...it reminds me of the situation we had with Gerry Francis and his obsession with turning us into his (relatively) successfull spell at QPR bringing in Sinton and Ferdinand represented (to me) a lack of ideas and simply trying to go with what you know (when so many other variables were differnt from his days at Rangers)
So I still would somewhat prefer Hunterlaar although I am happy if we sign Crouch and see it as the realistic option and maybe the best we can expect (and I Would agree that it is a better more balanced strike force than that we currently pocess)
I'm sure Pav & Keane signed as a first choice strikers? and not that long ago either!
Rather Keane go than Pav.
What he said ^
Keane will be off to Sunderland, mark my words.
I'd prefer Keane to go than Pav too, purely because he and Defoe are in direct competition and cannot work together. Pav could effectively play with Crouch, Defoe and Huntelaar for example.